Return-Path: X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 168AAC16A126 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2024 18:25:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.659 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.659 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yYksga-bg-3J for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2024 18:25:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E992BC14CF13 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2024 18:25:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WHRJq0jjfznkMt; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 03:25:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: by faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 4WHRJp71QXzkp9t; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 03:25:46 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 03:25:46 +0200 From: 'Toerless Eckert' To: Sheng JIANG Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Message-ID-Hash: ZV3KCWSL46ROCBAEJBVIX2KAPPBQ4T2C X-Message-ID-Hash: ZV3KCWSL46ROCBAEJBVIX2KAPPBQ4T2C X-MailFrom: eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-anima.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: anima@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4 Precedence: list Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BAnima=5D_Sheng=3A_Early_IANA_review_for_draft-ietf-anima-brski-?= =?utf-8?q?discovery-03_please?= List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Dear Sheng, (author hat on): It would be great if you (chair hat on) could ask for IANA early review of draft-ietf-anima-brski-discovery-03. The IANA section is requesting three tables in on subsection of a registry (BRSKI), which i haven't seen done in before, so i was wondering what IANA thinks about that. There is a note in the section for IANA about this as well. Thanks a lot Toerless