[Anima] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8995 (6736)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sat, 13 November 2021 23:19 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7FC3A091E for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 15:19:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SMRk4H3k3PC9 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 15:19:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 563CF3A0913 for <anima@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 15:18:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 499) id 321361FD48; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 15:18:59 -0800 (PST)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: mcr@sandelman.ca, pritikin@cisco.com, mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca, tte+ietf@cs.fau.de, Michael.H.Behringer@gmail.com, kent+ietf@watsen.net, anima@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20211113231859.321361FD48@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2021 15:18:59 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/la9YJ57bxHNfRkDlHQ4DwA4i85Q>
Subject: [Anima] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8995 (6736)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2021 23:19:06 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8995, "Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6736 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Section: 5.5 Original Text ------------- MASA implementations SHOULD anticipate future media ntypes but, of course, will simply fail the request if those types are not yet known. Corrected Text -------------- MASA implementations SHOULD anticipate future media types but, of course, will simply fail the request if those types are not yet known. Notes ----- "ntypes" is not a word Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8995 (draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-45) -------------------------------------- Title : Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI) Publication Date : May 2021 Author(s) : M. Pritikin, M. Richardson, T. Eckert, M. Behringer, K. Watsen Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Anima] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8995 (6736) RFC Errata System