IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-22: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 16 July 2019 19:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B0B120124; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:05:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Griu8fnSF5oF; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:05:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C57112011F; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:05:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C7703808A; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 15:05:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56BC4B52; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 15:05:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
cc: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra@ietf.org, Toerless Eckert <tte+ietf@cs.fau.de>, anima@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, anima-chairs@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMA0U5rKi_1NBg-0riK2Xsty2bc=itfqSD91zz1bcB6g_g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <156282703648.15280.17739830959261983790.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <19180.1562875321@localhost> <CA+9kkMA0U5rKi_1NBg-0riK2Xsty2bc=itfqSD91zz1bcB6g_g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 15:05:23 -0400
Message-ID: <26415.1563303923@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/nXZZ4fEae6yDmrJBIiMlfkDV16Y>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-22: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 19:05:28 -0000

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
    > Howdy,

    > I would personally not suggest using IRIs here, given that the scheme
    > (https) is expected to retrieve a resource at a well-known location and
    > thus will always have to be mapped to a URI to do the retrieval (rather
    > than used in a string comparison or something similar) .  RFC 5280,
    > which this cites, actually goes through the steps pretty well, and I
    > think the complexity there demonstrates the advantage for constrained
    > devices of always using the URI form.

I have changed the references from IRI to URL, and the components from
iauthority to 'authority'.

-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email