IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] two EST question/suggestions

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Tue, 12 September 2017 14:33 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54B15132716 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 07:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lpmaffjv_v9h for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 07:33:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36209132332 for <anima@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 07:33:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1968; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1505226832; x=1506436432; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=8b4w2Elk7zm8+jF6QX+95Y8om9LH2AA9zHH9CGl+l9A=; b=i4CA+rfyeNuDFM+t5oAbbgrDa1ghL2XfIHy4KyvptAGbhon+O5/RsI5c 2MPeX1/8rIQldJnBmn8Z7pMy4zrSdoud6mH+xH/iH0LxiCl+Jo/2pUrs8 SyYG1EKHqd5SLPqMSNqW8e9Tr70zc6Q7FdtIjO5t9Bz6eG3B4mqRWOXxA I=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,383,1500940800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="654563079"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Sep 2017 14:33:50 +0000
Received: from [10.61.216.42] ([10.61.216.42]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v8CEXo7Q023381; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 14:33:50 GMT
To: "Max Pritikin (pritikin)" <pritikin@cisco.com>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: anima <anima@ietf.org>
References: <961.1504038708@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <BAA96F8A-C61E-4DE1-9837-7964A0E8B4A2@cisco.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <2a1cf1e7-f668-cf76-d471-78585d7ad7ba@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:33:52 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BAA96F8A-C61E-4DE1-9837-7964A0E8B4A2@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DBFdTGwoVbGoQ2SVIGuQV6D2gst4Xv0qT"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/nluYppzmFcItWnPts11fidAm0o0>
Subject: Re: [Anima] two EST question/suggestions
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 14:33:54 -0000

Hi,

> I agree a statement that HTTP2 etc is ok so long as it doesn’t change the possible client state machine…  ?

You need an MTI, and it should be the easiest and most compact thing to
implement.  While CoAP would be optimal, HTTP/1.1 is more than
sufficient, and the features in 2 in this case are not only unnecessary,
but undesirable overhead.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email