Re: [Anima] draft-richardson-anima-ace-constrained-voucher

peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> Tue, 01 May 2018 17:05 UTC

Return-Path: <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28D212E8C8; Tue, 1 May 2018 10:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h0xU9zVCPfuj; Tue, 1 May 2018 10:05:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lb3-smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net (lb3-smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net [194.109.24.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1152312E8C4; Tue, 1 May 2018 10:05:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.xs4all.nl ([IPv6:2001:888:0:22:194:109:20:216]) by smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net with ESMTPA id DYinfzb448U07DYinfMwVz; Tue, 01 May 2018 19:05:47 +0200
Received: from [178.18.63.249] by webmail.xs4all.nl with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Tue, 01 May 2018 19:05:45 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 19:05:45 +0200
From: peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
Cc: 'Michael Richardson' <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, anima@ietf.org, draft-richardson-anima-ace-constrained-voucher@ietf.org
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
Mail-Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
In-Reply-To: <042701d3e0bc$c42d4150$4c87c3f0$@augustcellars.com>
References: <030601d3de6e$2760f1f0$7622d5d0$@augustcellars.com> <24823.1525115896@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <042701d3e0bc$c42d4150$4c87c3f0$@augustcellars.com>
Message-ID: <50727c584139a458cc3fc322879dca1c@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@xs4all.nl
User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfNi1T2gHJ1xtb0icw7+TfFL1fyhFJnULfdPHvZnDJ3ISyoltLpi2isvjKpCIex/GfvdqB2fRfz96iWebQZwesxIkEOXpD2mMSJ4J8QdknDW/rX3tS9oi o7EhImJk6l9MDZshrxnY9g07ssMfEpIJY7Tq6qYYl/kdzYEMdKungWh6uGIelW4OI4Qb2B07UvdT2Wbyto3S+0BL0dTUvhgmDlsgPdQY9DEBLVCFSbV/Bk0d uhvRea27TfyLduUlmuNAoPZ+Q7nX9YpSH1YdkKaXsE1gxmBqCrvLZ2KrORqProGeQbNt4bsYPU//9y6J6kny+Lg1pmI83Ss7ns95y/bpyo+SB5wO+Fg3joTX HZQUVg6in2WDlpZ5OJ4FXzFZcV78FPofkgBFjpYHgGuI8Xm+igeKwhOZr6WXXekWhiNAMEXnwTVBoQSMb5B9Yo0czcB0RP4Oa6gsMsLnqdmwfzb9gBpw8/5A kdPuSQ5YK+ITxdnOjTU8KRaq6qRkzJsfH2RTHw==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/pPpTS_ecmB7k_HFTjELA_Bd8BkM>
Subject: Re: [Anima] draft-richardson-anima-ace-constrained-voucher
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 17:05:52 -0000

> There are a couple of questions that I would put here that I think 
> guides
> things.
> 
> *  Is there any expectation that the path components would ever change 
> for
> some implementation or are they always going to be the same?  Would a
> request voucher always be posted to /rv or could an implementation 
> change it
> to be /rvr?

No path components are immutable.

> *  Is there a reason for an endpoint to want to get what services are
> supported as a general rule rather than just assuming that if the root
> exists then all of the services are also going to exist.
> 
> If the answer to the first question is no, then I don't know that they 
> even
> need to have resource types.  You get the root and go from there.

Agree.

I will change the example and return the rt= with the first line
and no rt= for the following lines.
The text will mention that the first line MUST be returned,
and the 4 following lines MAY be returned to show the ct= values that 
are supported.

Greetings and thanks,

Peter