[Anima] Re: Discussion on BRSKI/cBRSKI/BRSKI-PRM requirements on signing the PVR
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 15 January 2025 18:34 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3EFBC15792A for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 10:34:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d2VlRboO75ts for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 10:34:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A14BCC1519B3 for <anima@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 10:34:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABFAE1800F; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:34:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with LMTP id KmoiSPgFfQkc; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:34:45 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1736966085; bh=XFOB3UEEJdq5jAGO5QIGQTeHXuqm9Vp/yuT9jsB/Fg4=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=q16KJYvsn5w7xubZBwghUs1vjNIb65rZ5jhMVqfJjOXgjU+g2DvqiHLPvdJEnxo3G Fou5BPbVrHnOvt5+FP5AC8OeEyfBBdebUK88xHzbuUl0mWe1wKwH7OyQL4BcGSnJQp PCXtZco/u4d+6tUZHOcKrAnlKlzZrJsrKcsSqdZxXLf2zTqnwff7nP/fQzAXYzwQmb 9OZ8jW4HMdCyFQB0CjL7U2+Q0wx5u7wTY5+QMQX28VBFmnm1d8N1aCwbv/vg2SyVZp NGWpUZyVer0318h4dOKdv3qOdjzCkdVcyJ28Dt2PC3fWNHJMUy15eMuJOetmJSIMSM XQNbpLJfbBpXA==
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18ABD1800E; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:34:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129E9468; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:34:45 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>, "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <DU0P190MB197838F0171066F9C3CEB801FD182@DU0P190MB1978.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <DU0P190MB197881C7B003306108D9AE43FD182@DU0P190MB1978.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <10111.1736884824@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <DU0P190MB197838F0171066F9C3CEB801FD182@DU0P190MB1978.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8+dev; GNU Emacs 28.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0;<'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:34:45 -0500
Message-ID: <32750.1736966085@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Message-ID-Hash: OHIXOTKXWDF3OXQ6IVGVPDCHKK4HMPNR
X-Message-ID-Hash: OHIXOTKXWDF3OXQ6IVGVPDCHKK4HMPNR
X-MailFrom: mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-anima.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Anima] Re: Discussion on BRSKI/cBRSKI/BRSKI-PRM requirements on signing the PVR
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/pcHpU0IU79p82rpTzOw9hwC-GXc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:anima-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:anima-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anima-leave@ietf.org>
Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl> wrote: > We have some discussion (to be continued) whether the Registrar can be > expected to be preloaded with all CAs in the chains, or a subset of > only the highest sub-CAs, or only the root CA ? The more the Registrar > already knows, the less the Pledge has to send in its PVR, given that > the MASA would know all its own CAs for sure. I wonder if we should mandate that the MASA be willing to answer a /crts request (on the BRSKI-MASA protocol) which the complete list of all CAs and subordinate CAs. That would keep the size of the subordinate certificates out of the BRSKI-EST. That's important today for cBRSKI, but later on, in a quantum-safe world, it might also matter to (fat)BRSKI. You convinced me on Tuesday that I should ask for adoption of the operational considerations documents already. But the above proposal goes beyond operation *considerations*, right? -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [ ] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
- [Anima] Discussion on BRSKI/cBRSKI/BRSKI-PRM requ… Esko Dijk
- [Anima] Re: Discussion on BRSKI/cBRSKI/BRSKI-PRM … Michael Richardson
- [Anima] Re: Discussion on BRSKI/cBRSKI/BRSKI-PRM … Esko Dijk
- [Anima] Re: Discussion on BRSKI/cBRSKI/BRSKI-PRM … Fries, Steffen
- [Anima] Re: Discussion on BRSKI/cBRSKI/BRSKI-PRM … Esko Dijk
- [Anima] Re: Discussion on BRSKI/cBRSKI/BRSKI-PRM … Fries, Steffen
- [Anima] Re: Discussion on BRSKI/cBRSKI/BRSKI-PRM … Esko Dijk
- [Anima] Re: Discussion on BRSKI/cBRSKI/BRSKI-PRM … Michael Richardson
- [Anima] Re: Discussion on BRSKI/cBRSKI/BRSKI-PRM … Esko Dijk
- [Anima] Re: Discussion on BRSKI/cBRSKI/BRSKI-PRM … Michael Richardson
- [Anima] Re: Discussion on BRSKI/cBRSKI/BRSKI-PRM … Esko Dijk