IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Anima] towards adoption of draft-richardson-anima-jose-voucher

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 14 June 2021 17:32 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C4D3A2BCD for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 10:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wFpshjrWwmSI for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 10:32:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6375B3A2BCE for <anima@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 10:32:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [142.169.78.190]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53E0A1F456 for <anima@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 17:32:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id ED51E1A293E; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 13:31:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>
Re: [Anima] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-anima-brski-async-enroll-02.txt
In-reply-to: <eb471e23b0a04f058eccd5cd60fb3786@siemens.com>
References: <162368780451.16015.5829264819793833732@ietfa.amsl.com> <eb471e23b0a04f058eccd5cd60fb3786@siemens.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Fries, Steffen" <steffen.fries@siemens.com> message dated "Mon, 14 Jun 2021 16:27:35 -0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 13:31:58 -0400
Message-ID: <80357.1623691918@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/rw-l0BKMZJOWWJMqSoFl6MKbwgE>
Subject: [Anima] towards adoption of draft-richardson-anima-jose-voucher
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 17:32:07 -0000

Hi WG, Thomas Werner and I wrote draft-richardson-anima-jose-voucher last year.
The draft-ietf-anima-brski-async-enroll-02 document wants to do everything
with JOSE signed JSON rather than CMS signed JSON.
(I continue to argue that COSE-signed-CBOR will be better if doing things
over native BTLE)

The document does not do any YANG work!
What do we need to do get the document adopted?  It has no dependancies, but
async-enroll depends upon it.

The hardest part was decided between JWS Compact Serialization and JWS JSON Serialization.
We use Compact, which comes as three base64URL encoded pieces.

Fries, Steffen <steffen.fries@siemens.com> wrote:
    >    o Defined call flow and objects for interactions in use case2.
    > Object format based on draft for JOSE signed voucher artifacts and
    > aligned the remaining objects with this approach in Section 5.2.3

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email