IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] ANIMA-WG: pls chime in: early allocation for otherName code points (draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane)

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Thu, 02 July 2020 13:41 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C28113A07ED; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 06:41:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0mgPyB-TrEJH; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 06:41:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4F933A07E5; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 06:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1280; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1593697277; x=1594906877; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=0oPNAdindKHqmmzixUQSjjinqQKSWZGc4RLkROqHCho=; b=PgUUXG9PxdOHhuwXhoA6oF0irveXMpU9aXs80nRu+8E9CedXv/ua/6W4 Kx6hhGFTdtHnhHwoQ+OBNFPTeyeuQB6hBTC2kfzFw9l04dCjjlvYYitfx Ei3c2HaGzib55WJD/xnn/pyHExoEQYQps4t5TuWtMh57lX1XChy8NzD25 c=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,304,1589241600"; d="scan'208";a="27551850"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 02 Jul 2020 13:41:15 +0000
Received: from ams3-vpn-dhcp5065.cisco.com (ams3-vpn-dhcp5065.cisco.com [10.61.83.200]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 062DfE0m005946 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 2 Jul 2020 13:41:14 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200702132922.GA11404@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 15:41:14 +0200
Cc: anima@ietf.org, "anima-chairs@ietf.org" <anima-chairs@ietf.org>, "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>, housley@vigilsec.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <91A85F2F-D9D7-4D64-8672-50DF942A063C@cisco.com>
References: <20200702132922.GA11404@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.83.200, ams3-vpn-dhcp5065.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/sJnla7VLjMo_SKSlmFrpTuceW2s>
Subject: Re: [Anima] ANIMA-WG: pls chime in: early allocation for otherName code points (draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 13:41:19 -0000

I have no objection.  My only caution is that otherName is poorly supported in the open source tool sets, but that is something we could conceivably work on.

Eliot

> On 2 Jul 2020, at 15:29, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> 
> Dear WG (ACP author head/hat on)
> 
> ACP Revision -26 introduced a new otherName / AcpNodeName encoding for the ACP Domain Information
> (now call AcpNodeName / acp-node-name). Michael Richardson (and potentially other) implementors
> would like to update implementation to use this new encoding for interop testing,
> which requires allocation of two IANA code points (technically i think only one is
> required for the implementation, but the toolchain would require both if i understand it
> correctly).
> 
> The early allocation process RFC7120 requires to vet the community for interest in the
> early allocation, so pls. chime in with a +1, or if you must a -1 and explanation.
> 
> I'll do a +1 from the authors side.
> 
> The remaining requirements of RFC7120 for early allocations are AFAIK met.
> 
> Thanks!
>    Toerless
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Anima mailing list
> Anima@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email