Re: [Anima] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8366 (5949)

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 31 December 2019 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC7412004E for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 12:06:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Z8X4esaf7Nt for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 12:06:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69DBD120047 for <anima@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 12:06:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CE6C38981 for <anima@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 15:06:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16FA3FE for <anima@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 15:06:48 -0500 (EST)
To: anima@ietf.org
References: <20191229165322.81440F406C5@rfc-editor.org>
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Message-ID: <6351efe7-668b-480d-5d94-425341f13d07@sandelman.ca>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 15:06:48 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20191229165322.81440F406C5@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/tT-H-n7cjyn7u9MUPsnc-3DSUIs>
Subject: Re: [Anima] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8366 (5949)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 20:06:52 -0000

On 2019-12-29 11:53 a.m., RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8366,
> "A Voucher Artifact for Bootstrapping Protocols".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5949
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Tetsuya Hasegawa <te.hasegawa2@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: 5.1.
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>     7.  Devices that support decrypting SZTP artifacts MUST posses the
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>     7.  Devices that support decrypting SZTP artifacts MUST possess the
> 

Looks correct to me.
Chairs, I think you can approve this.