Re: [Anima] ANIMA: opinions about when to have webex anima meeting ? (IETF107 cancelled, now what ?)

Michael Richardson <> Wed, 11 March 2020 14:37 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF14E3A0833; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.888
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RUZ2EKOzHw_c; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:37:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CA9F3A0804; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED8138985; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:36:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5871AE8; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:37:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <>
To: Toerless Eckert <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 25.1.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:37:33 -0400
Message-ID: <16266.1583937453@localhost>
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Anima] ANIMA: opinions about when to have webex anima meeting ? (IETF107 cancelled, now what ?)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 14:37:51 -0000

Toerless Eckert <> wrote:
    > I was suggesting on the IETF mailing list to also allow the option to
    > have the virtual WG meeting at the pre-allocated WG time-slot(s) during the
    > IETF107 week, especially because most attendees would hopefully have
    > that time slot available in their schedule, while later times may be
    > less easy to carve free.

    > If you have opinions about when we should have an anima WG webex
    > meeiting, please chime in. If you do prefer the time during IETF week,
    > then maybe chime in to the discuss on, otherwise, please
    > or also have opinions here, or of coure always PM to

If you must do somethin todayg, post a doodle poll (Yes/No/If-Needbe) offering:
1) both of the IETF107 week ANIMA time-slots
2) some selection of China, PST/EST and Europe friendly slots in the two
   weeks afterwards.

From the results, consider having two 1.5 slots, one slot optimized for each
group of time zones.  Make sure that people enter If-Needbe if it won't be
during their "day".

Michael Richardson <>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-