Re: [Anima] draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management: normaive/informational

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 14 August 2017 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6453813240F for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ViPiVuOOYoRp for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x234.google.com (mail-pg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 613ED1323D4 for <anima@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x234.google.com with SMTP id i12so2619232pgr.3 for <anima@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=JQueGE0U21Z9+r96bZ65PBQTwvdAxonfEMFvyBxfCBM=; b=ubeVJE+Wjfip+cRYdOjECcIzPOTXEJ5KgFDYwgQahEJNGkKrnV1/YHBwLiX6gsl7H9 2buttgO0D+6bzwUbXqWnz1cM9ZDFdsSRub7SR+D5z+V2TaENhq/Z74MJqw9lRQ3cQSq5 O7mazXwfWQyRdf+ocoC02I2UiqE3kyuDDxn9RZlAAgG/lTqGpLIqg4GtjsuYBpNwSCyn tcFPw300/N0T9ywvfSR9nLLTRnMBBhLsjK/M8nzBJyslmdvFWNRsMsi9+u1kiDcTHWuR lUOj/Mu5tCd4XivvvXAWC/FQRjJx1X3xNhNx10PDfMHCLulxFNry4Rc02h9+gGB1omNy XC+A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JQueGE0U21Z9+r96bZ65PBQTwvdAxonfEMFvyBxfCBM=; b=AQRKzdVJ9ZMvTFuTW0XfrnlK+gHkbFF4Y/nFOZbZlv1mODdUlg29GWX5O1b5TtWBfN fIR22VcqdmDSiGpfI957QOqRKkRbB1Q4nu9ARphqeOrmCQumxqd9+dJ4Ao4KRVP6AIXh Z58jF+MROda+4OlN4Z9bAguutfUvzy41KtAY2u5F828dJSKXt6iua/cZKeAry5Ezzh4/ 99nQcvqBtEj6XCuRFD1Q5I0AGeLS0dGKR1N4ajqmxywTrhJ9yHRRZESGjj5VDmpv8f9h sjvcbP1fr4n8GBcLdDeNr8PbXLHT3CuLWnf2lqF1Hztm+R63LLqchKlBwMtkOcOvK94S aThw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5hdBOlVCZQpi9Poppmo6/LJvAbu2SPgjVEFu3MZFLvsHsVniLgF 6LSK1azoCCAA9HLJ
X-Received: by 10.84.142.131 with SMTP id 3mr29254524plx.130.1502740393761; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:53:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:521f:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:521f:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w24sm15273591pfk.183.2017.08.14.12.53.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:53:13 -0700 (PDT)
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
Cc: Anima WG <anima@ietf.org>
References: <20170814060839.GA765@faui40p.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <45abfa82-5b29-694b-a0a7-c58587d5f167@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 07:53:09 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170814060839.GA765@faui40p.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/uHU_hlukxbEovp-prQYL_flcbjg>
Subject: Re: [Anima] draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management: normaive/informational
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 19:53:16 -0000

On 14/08/2017 18:08, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> Only the references. Some are outdated.
> 
> BRSKI to me is not normative. Neither is I-D.ietf-core-yang-cbor.
> 
> ACP may or may be normative. I am not quite clear on the rules:

The rules are not so important for Informational RFCs anyway.
 
> IMHO, prefix-management is not a full solution spec which is why it's also informational.
> rhe spec part of it relates to how to use GRASP, so only GRASP is logically normative to
> me. But you may have better insights ito how the IESG judges this.

No, I think you're right. Seeing no comments from the co-authors, I will push a version
with those changes today.

Regards
   Brian

> 
> Cheers
>     Toerless
> 
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 05:11:09PM +1200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> Thanks Toerless. I'm not hearing any disagreement so that will be
>> in the next version. With your WG Chair hat on, are there any other
>> changes required?
>>
>> Regards
>>    Brian
>>
>> On 14/08/2017 16:47, Toerless Eckert wrote:
>>> Reaffirming my preference for 1.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 05:17:21PM +1200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>>> As a reminder, we have two options in the draft for adding support
>>>> of IPv4 prefix management:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Add a version number flag to the objective
>>>> 2. Add a second objective specific to IPv4
>>>>
>>>> So far the preferences I have heard (including my own) are for option 1,
>>>> because it's simpler to implement. I think the authors will go that way for the
>>>> next version, but of course it's a WG choice. Comments please!
>>>>
>>>> Quick link:
>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management-04#section-5.2
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>    Brian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Anima mailing list
>>>> Anima@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Anima mailing list
>> Anima@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
>