Re: [Anima] CASM BOF

[Laurent Ciavaglia <[e-mail]>]

Hello,

Indeed a very important change from Centralized to Coordinated.
I remember discussions at IETF94/Yokohama about possible solutions to 
the ASM problem and the centralized approach was really preeminent and 
thus putting out of scope potential solutions more distributed (à la ANIMA).

Also, ASM is one of the problems that might benefit from a "coordinated" 
management approach.
We could think about generalizing the scheme to shared resources / 
resource pool management (instead of only addresses / address ranges as 
the resource).

Best regards, Laurent.


On 21/03/2017 15:12, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Brian E Carpenter <[e-mail]> wrote:
>      k> I've been tracking this a bit. Their main focus is on a YANG interface
>      k> between the NOC and the IPAM system. It's thanks to me that the C
>      k> stands for Coordinated instead of Centralized.
>
> Cool.
>
>      k> I believe that our prefix management use case is part of the back end
>      k> for this rather than competition, but we should definitely track the
>      k> work.
>
> I agree: it complementary.  I guess I think of ANIMA as being the front
> end that talks to the IPAM in the back-end :-)
>
>
> --
> ]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
> ]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [
> ]     [e-mail]  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [
>
> _______________________________________________
> Anima mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
>

-- 

Laurent Ciavaglia

Nokia, Bell Labs

[phone]

route de Villejust - Nozay, France

linkedin.com/in/laurent.ciavaglia