Re: [Anima] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8995 (7263)
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 17 January 2024 16:40 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3B1C14F609 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 08:40:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HE47s9-BRa-s for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 08:40:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EAF1C14F6B0 for <anima@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 08:40:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91CAF1800D; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:40:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 2UDfnD-NYklt; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:40:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F771800C; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:39:59 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1705509599; bh=QkaCHb4BjlXT97zbiIgda+IdYYMVQNfm83rqN+ELUAk=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=QEL8pQw7PIbBNDjvI2bmjVylwmcKzPITxa8iCYXlB0fx9T7US1Eq4bsjbJWbKiQzQ rijrDIAZvjwdYuGkg5XiNo65ZFaVxKObYdhSDoVMw/BKqVqcZlzbUGvR4k9WNf6W/o +kMMq1H41b7UxXRIbmFPBNCkfBrqSLDJag+h2BIgMxAbsajMRMGD0xFyyH6O3T3F2b NdAl6y6fnwjoVBYTaJrcXK+ggVGUmQIQnNqVVjI/+8zLrcFjsOL3nadTBcAme4xpO5 cBL/j382jf7givDp2CqTxvfhlL5/pGKxUjUtysGSE3XassZYySNXWef2TIA37JL0WZ Rn6AQoGPqwu8A==
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E259E132; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:39:59 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
cc: Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>, "Buschart, Rufus" <rufus.buschart@siemens.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "Max Pritikin (pritikin)" <pritikin@cisco.com>, "tte+ietf@cs.fau.de" <tte+ietf@cs.fau.de>, "Michael.H.Behringer@gmail.com" <Michael.H.Behringer@gmail.com>, "kent+ietf@watsen.net" <kent+ietf@watsen.net>, "warren@kumari.net" <warren@kumari.net>, "tte@cs.fau.de" <tte@cs.fau.de>, "shengjiang@bupt.edu.cn" <shengjiang@bupt.edu.cn>, "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <LV8PR11MB8536124688ADED318D649B92B56C2@LV8PR11MB8536.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20221209152045.941B755D24@rfcpa.amsl.com> <DU0P190MB197838872826375C7351D782FD1F9@DU0P190MB1978.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <15209.1670714790@localhost> <DU0P190MB1978FB9ADD6CE832FBE59A3AFDE29@DU0P190MB1978.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <31352.1670878336@localhost> <AM8PR10MB465800B7EC928F17FCAEE5AF9EE29@AM8PR10MB4658.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <DU0P190MB197814FBFFDDFDCEC3CC0DF1FDE39@DU0P190MB1978.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <AM8PR10MB4658C36AF7348D23528195D49EE39@AM8PR10MB4658.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <LV8PR11MB85362B43D20E23E53ADE4C73B56C2@LV8PR11MB8536.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <DU0P190MB19785432AE76D6B5F083B711FD6C2@DU0P190MB1978.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <LV8PR11MB8536124688ADED318D649B92B56C2@LV8PR11MB8536.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 28.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:39:59 -0500
Message-ID: <28079.1705509599@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/v9xf1LCWGifisfbjKjKy0xlJSSk>
Subject: Re: [Anima] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8995 (7263)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 16:40:06 -0000
Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com> wrote:
> Okay, I can add a clarification to the errata to indicate that RFC 2119
> language is not required for the text to still be normative, and if
> this text is updated, the other sections should be updated in a
> consistent fashion.
If you like.
I don't have a strong opinion. Probably we should have used BCP14 language there.
> An alternative resolution here is for me to reject the errata,
> indicating that the text is still a normative requirement even though
> it doesn’t use RFC 2119 language. Specifically, I don’t think that the
> existing text is wrong, but consistently using RFC 2119 keywords may
> add clarity.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
- [Anima] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8995 (7263) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Anima] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8995 (… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8995 (… Esko Dijk
- Re: [Anima] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8995 (… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8995 (… Esko Dijk
- Re: [Anima] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8995 (… Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [Anima] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8995 (… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8995 (… Buschart, Rufus
- Re: [Anima] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8995 (… Esko Dijk
- Re: [Anima] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8995 (… Buschart, Rufus
- Re: [Anima] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8995 (… Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [Anima] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8995 (… Esko Dijk
- Re: [Anima] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8995 (… Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [Anima] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8995 (… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8995 (… Michael Richardson