[Anima] getting BRSKI and ACP done
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 06 October 2020 20:31 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E380C3A0F55 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 13:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5BggQnioSWHp for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 13:31:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 310753A0EB8 for <anima@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 13:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E89389C6 for <anima@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 16:36:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id gLExIqkWJLwU for <anima@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 16:36:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655AD389C5 for <anima@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 16:36:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F4970D for <anima@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 16:30:59 -0400 (EDT)
To: anima@ietf.org
References: <19427.1600704984@localhost>
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Message-ID: <668b988a-8fc9-5bdb-e703-1dc8d14521f6@sandelman.ca>
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 16:30:59 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <19427.1600704984@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/vZ0qXZIxoojYFIX_9vLnaOHjG58>
Subject: [Anima] getting BRSKI and ACP done
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 20:31:08 -0000
Warren sent an email to the RFC-editor informing them that the LC on the
name change was success, but it wasn't CC to the list.
https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C325 shows version
-44 in queue.
My understanding is that the ACP document has been revised according to
the Erik Kline's DISCUSS, but awaits his confirmation.
- Re: [Anima] [Last-Call] Post approval change on d… Michael Richardson
- [Anima] getting BRSKI and ACP done Michael Richardson