Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-22: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 13 August 2019 15:37 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E40A1201E3; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 08:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AHjizdkvv-Di; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 08:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC725120219; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 08:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462CF3818C; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 11:37:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1E5E8E; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 11:37:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
cc: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra@ietf.org, tte+ietf@cs.fau.de, anima@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, anima-chairs@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <ffdb35e3-3f7e-4d5f-dff8-be04ebb3429c@nostrum.com>
References: <156282301326.15131.7510532622479656237.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <12747.1563315277@localhost> <ffdb35e3-3f7e-4d5f-dff8-be04ebb3429c@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 11:37:47 -0400
Message-ID: <9337.1565710667@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/w12JzPtj3ZtRI7gMhVpH5bnpcAk>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-22: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 15:37:53 -0000
Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote: >> Adam Roach: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/6AAD9mwsKEsbIUmXRVOAV0N83yA >> ... >> This is an rfcdiff from the already-wrapped JSON to the proposed -23 that >> includes all the changes from the various DISCUSSes up to now: >> https://tinyurl.com/y2qhjwh8 > As a quick note -- the diff above does not address the "discuss" part of my > second discuss point: the document remains ambiguous regarding *how* the URL > is to be returned. The lengthy parenthetical references added to the > corresponding paragraph aren't sufficient to positively indicate that the URL > appears in a "Location" header: this needs to be stated explicitly rather > than implied by a section reference. I had previously updated to point to RFC7231 section 6.3.2, but upon careful reading, I see that returning the URL in the Location: is not mandated by 6.3.2. I am a little bit surprised that 7231 is so vague on what I thought was a pretty much written in stone process.... <t> Rather than returning the audit log as a response to the POST (with a return code 200), the MASA MAY instead return a 201 ("Created") - response (<xref target="RFC7231" /> sections 6.3.2 and 7.1) containing - a URL to the prepared (and idempotent, therefore cachable) audit response. + response (<xref target="RFC7231" /> sections 6.3.2 and 7.1), with + the URL to the prepared (and idempotent, therefore cachable) audit + response in the Location: header. </t> Does this fix things for you? -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
- [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-an… Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Adam Roach
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Benjamin Kaduk
- [Anima] What does PKIX refer to: Re: Benjamin Kad… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] What does PKIX refer to: Re: Benjamin… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] What does PKIX refer to: Re: Benjamin… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Benjamin Kaduk
- [Anima] Change of authors for draft-ietf-anima-bo… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Adam Roach
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Anima] {FINAL} Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on d… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-iet… Michael Richardson