Re: [Anima] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-anima-grasp-api-08: (with COMMENT)

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 03 December 2020 19:54 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3853A0983; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 11:54:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A2_n5c7pW9FS; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 11:54:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62e.google.com (mail-pl1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 953453A0930; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 11:54:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id y10so290579plr.10; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 11:54:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NhM6Buh+rq1SjAAmJJaJQgElWBhseSvR66AVkNGgHg0=; b=bANciAnszyflZ1KQnE/v+A4IheTTy3o0dNRZhEGMeJolcPSkk4UDZTlJdaowpgz7Bc oMcc0UHb16IdM5MP7RKTcRMBW34QGTesLN244vUaNL9s3zfXmuBZpruqDnIzU2CxHqQX gYK6kxaY6MoXShhAkvBHm/0zi7pPbiSKxucfOdj+jlrnzS1SivQi7m4UBBYTzgAVfvPC ETc5WkVBT/LArdCnGZKsxrUNYsOZSwL8hn94WFGUGdbHca5gooYvX/5vORN/ieQfCq1o G4mkqeYvt2w4KuCYqUjb+JNsUY3w6ZSqEhZJlQRv7idrZdOMZ6a/+fo/UngGQGYkGZCP mVEg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NhM6Buh+rq1SjAAmJJaJQgElWBhseSvR66AVkNGgHg0=; b=koYDdE3wEi3xvO2ZsuIuQzddTtkJYLeRPMZLAwFVWh5exEHxeMznp7vdpxv+kcp+bH 3C4jXuK7sCjRUKH2Zg6wb2QvJa5UyHrYWvH89dAafJIoVR6iiIDJpMg4Q29Cupmchfnj VXL+TrKDBezfzymtY5J55rBHEyeSO6sJUsSHdJ768DvQAGIY2u/2vezznALjujLVluyG tpyPDUgWgxALZS6VuP2vvsmduxPFF9IH6tF6W9Tea7upO8tKuNTGeYMbEAFyR14oaccq Vj/G/zxfWNHaYzacv9xb/1KOOSJ6uS0uJiTCLrpdWe94uEHcj/Aojb6gjHo4q+E4kJh1 /tSQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532I37a19Jay6tSJPtg6dS6xyeOVBwWAmOgLb0pWcwIc52UtjotJ KEaIRbsfmiLr0ATpEjRiDNY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyBe85Ar0FZA5ZzSXVckKB2zG6cdgWxzYg4Fa2QZTwZwGIZPYQV5ULaNM+al3+izGYXnol5CQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3687:: with SMTP id mj7mr681100pjb.76.1607025291962; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 11:54:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([151.210.131.28]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d8sm204916pjv.3.2020.12.03.11.54.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Dec 2020 11:54:51 -0800 (PST)
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-anima-grasp-api@ietf.org, anima-chairs@ietf.org, anima@ietf.org, Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
References: <160700353348.5904.13674091861855112185@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <63eaa10d-c128-d925-74b6-dbf2a139652e@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 08:54:47 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <160700353348.5904.13674091861855112185@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/xISlh57vEW90vdYExw6wNOFmJXE>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-anima-grasp-api-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 19:54:55 -0000

Thanks Alissa. Paul's reviews have been extremely thorough and helpful, and
we will try to resolve all his comments in the next version.

Yes, I agree that more experience is needed. The core GRASP documents
are all in the hands of the RFC Editor now, so we are in good shape
for that to happen.

Regards
   Brian

On 04-Dec-20 02:52, Alissa Cooper via Datatracker wrote:
> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-anima-grasp-api-08: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-anima-grasp-api/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> There are  a few outstanding unresolved comments from the Gen-ART review that
> it would be useful to resolve, particularly clarifications in Section 2.3.5.
> 
> In general the Gen-ART review made me wonder if it might be useful to get some
> more implementation experience and interop testing going before trying to
> extend or build out much more functionality on top of GRASP, since there are
> many implementation-specific decisions left unspecified.
> 
> 
> 
>