[Anima] Re: Sheng: early allocation request please

[Sheng JIANG <[e-mail]>]

Hi, Toerless,

I (with my chair-hat on) approve this Early Allocation with IANA. I will
make the request to Mahesh soon.

Regards,

Sheng

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail]
> <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of 'Toerless Eckert'
> Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2024 12:45 AM
> To: Sheng JIANG <[e-mail]>
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]
> Subject: Sheng: early allocation request please
> 
> Hi Sheng
> 
> Can you please approve and request (according to RFC7120) the following
> Early Allocation with IANA:
> (aka: get approval from Mahesh, forward to IANA).
> 
> 1. Registry: "IETF YANG SID Range" -
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-sid/yang-sid.xhtml
> 
> 2. Requested registry entries:
> 
>    Entry Point     Size    Module Name              Reference
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>    2450              50    ietf-voucher
> I-D.ietf-anima-rfc8366bis
>    2500              50    ietf-voucher-request
> I-D.ietf-anima-rfc8366bis
> 
> 3. Explanation
> 
>    These two entry points are currently listed in the registry with
>    a) obsolete Module Name
>    b) wrong reference
>    c) without yet having received an official Early allocation
> 
>    The SID definition was moved from I-D.ietf-anima-constrained-voucher
> some time
>    into I-D.ietf-anima-rfc8366bis, and in that process the Module Names
> where
>    changed. Early Allocations are now becoming necessary as the registry
is
>    about to be initially finalized with its defining RFC
(I-D.ietf-core-sid) being
> in
>    RFC-editor/AUTH48.
> 
>    Justification/stability: the SID range definitions are in rfc8366bis
since at
> least
>    2022 and are stable.
> 
> 4. Contact:  Toerless Eckert (co-author)
>              Sheng Jiang (WG chair)
> 
> Thanks a lot!
>     Toerless (for the authors)