Re: [Anima] ACP SRV.est example
Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Tue, 16 July 2019 21:48 UTC
Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB365120139; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 14:48:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.95
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.95 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cxCMj2ZMwdES; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 14:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D9161200D8; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 14:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D056154800B; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 23:48:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id BDBFD440041; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 23:48:47 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 23:48:47 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane@ietf.org, anima@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20190716214847.vyp5ce4ho6z3qkpz@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <23875.1563296300@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <23875.1563296300@localhost>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/ySXBgms1pKmFnCV7XW9Jqyd9Uko>
Subject: Re: [Anima] ACP SRV.est example
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 21:48:55 -0000
Thanks
Added to issues on github.
Waiting for an IESG review to come back to me then i can do the
next rev and fix this as well.
Cheers
Toerless
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 12:58:20PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> I suggest that EST servers are never on port 80, and are likely
> on port 443, or another port.
>
>
> 6.1.4.1. GRASP objective for EST server
>
> ACP nodes that are EST servers MUST announce their service via GRASP
> in the ACP through M_FLOOD messages. See [I-D.ietf-anima-grasp],
> section 2.8.11 for the definition of this message type:
>
> Example:
>
> [M_FLOOD, 12340815, h'fd89b714f3db0000200000064000001', 210000,
> ["SRV.est", 4, 255 ],
> [O_IPv6_LOCATOR,
> h'fd89b714f3db0000200000064000001',
> TCP, 80]
> ]
>
> Figure 3: GRASP SRV.est example
>
>
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Anima mailing list
> Anima@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
--
---
tte@cs.fau.de
- [Anima] ACP SRV.est example Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] ACP SRV.est example Toerless Eckert