[Anima] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-anima-01-05: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 30 April 2019 21:01 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: anima@ietf.org
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0131203C9; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 14:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: anima-chairs@ietf.org, anima@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.95.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <155665807288.7572.676096492399468792.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 14:01:12 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/zgRz_SObqBqUnhqu2MPPTrK9jMY>
Subject: [Anima] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-anima-01-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 21:01:17 -0000

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-anima-01-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-anima/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Please note that I support Martin's BLOCK with respect to the support or
absence of support of "Intent".

Deborah's question about 'by professionals' is indeed a very valid point.