Re: [antitrust-policy] Who enforces an Antitrust Policy for the IETF

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 16 January 2012 16:34 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6357921F868C for <antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:34:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.992
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.992 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.393, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02OM9caxMW5U for <antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:34:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A16D421F8539 for <antitrust-policy@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:34:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 73132 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2012 16:34:19 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 16 Jan 2012 16:34:19 -0000
Date: 16 Jan 2012 16:33:57 -0000
Message-ID: <20120116163357.76689.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: antitrust-policy@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <7C4DFCE962635144B8FAE8CA11D0BF1E05A7CF0539@MX14A.corp.emc.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Cc: david.black@emc.com
Subject: Re: [antitrust-policy] Who enforces an Antitrust Policy for the IETF
X-BeenThere: antitrust-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss the need for an antitrust or competition policy for the IETF." <antitrust-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/antitrust-policy>, <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/antitrust-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:antitrust-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/antitrust-policy>, <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:34:25 -0000

>Of course, meeting termination is a last resort, but if all else fails ...

Sounds like an impressive DoS vector for people who don't like the direction
a group is going, doesn't it?

I'd still like to get back to what problem we're trying to solve, since it's
hard to evaluate solutions without that.

R's,
John