Re: [antitrust-policy] Who enforces an Antitrust Policy for the IETF

Marshall Eubanks <marshall.eubanks@gmail.com> Sat, 21 January 2012 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <marshall.eubanks@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94BE221F846F for <antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:29:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.495
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.104, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PnjQZdOLgGVh for <antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:29:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E50CF21F846E for <antitrust-policy@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:29:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obbwc12 with SMTP id wc12so2206687obb.31 for <antitrust-policy@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:29:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Bwy8BO6aV1JHa72KNvePBLRnF8ELg+bVVXIo8rnF87c=; b=r1ylTygsCOlcOTt9KX1eAS0qa+EW8Sm9xXoCB0ox1xnHKH0MdBIvIaKTUo4n5Ttc4+ NRB81NABXoWK1aXpuURen78ClqJBz/t/YL4kIOPax2L6Bjvs/KBsywXcIG7FJgEDCLS/ FBER8HdK7v1nfmh6v71qoR1MjO6m9ecwnwbzI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.75.65 with SMTP id a1mr2391964obw.32.1327174174524; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:29:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.79.102 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:29:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1201211412420.30314@joyce.lan>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1201201740230.82728@joyce.lan> <CAJNg7VKPEK8L=iEAP18F-1HTu4tKh2fRmB9Z7jvh-wSFCLH3Yw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1201211412420.30314@joyce.lan>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:29:34 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJNg7V+9uPHSeu2R7i_0vcf9Pvi4MidHfC5cLVNibp4102OCKQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Marshall Eubanks <marshall.eubanks@gmail.com>
To: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: antitrust-policy@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [antitrust-policy] Who enforces an Antitrust Policy for the IETF
X-BeenThere: antitrust-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss the need for an antitrust or competition policy for the IETF." <antitrust-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/antitrust-policy>, <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/antitrust-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:antitrust-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/antitrust-policy>, <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 19:29:35 -0000

On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 2:22 PM, John R. Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote:
>>> Lawyer: Do you make any attempt to enforce that policy?
>>>
>>> IETF person: Not really.
>>
>>
>> IETF Person' : We have a clear policy and steps to make sure that
>> every participant sees and reads that policy. We also
>> provide training to those in leadership positions, such as working
>> Group Chairs and higher level chairs.
>
>
> Russ was saying that we wouldn't have an enforcement plan, you're saying
> that that we would, putting the primary responsibility on WG chairs.  Can
> you two have an argument and decide who won?
>
> Keeping in mind that this policy, unlike all the existing IETF policies, is
> primarily to deflect lawsuits against the IETF, this means that if I were a
> WG chair and some sort of antitrust naughtiness happened in my group, the
> presumption would be that I let it happen so it's my fault. Even if it
> happened at a meeting when I wasn't there. (This is how lawyers think. Ask
> one if you don't believe me.)

And, if it that should happen without a plan, they will still blame
you and will cite you this email as they do so.

I fail to see how that is better.

Regards
Marshall

>
> I can't say that I would have much interest in being a WG chair under those
> conditions.
>
> Regards,
> John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for
> Dummies",
> Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly