Re: [antitrust-policy] how does that affect those with no competitive interests?

Marshall Eubanks <marshall.eubanks@gmail.com> Fri, 20 January 2012 22:12 UTC

Return-Path: <marshall.eubanks@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348FB21F8631 for <antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:12:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.494
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.105, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D2KbycQ+fpiz for <antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:12:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EDDD21F84E6 for <antitrust-policy@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:12:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obbwc12 with SMTP id wc12so1520925obb.31 for <antitrust-policy@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:12:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cuwy1r0b/tYPEeUAkksEZb9GyK954WS/wrH5yfqXp3o=; b=qpC2BqrEFrC+U5IDCPFIbwZ70Q+aBbEmljwNM0iQp7zc7pFEe+TqBftVUwnwG8iY2Q ctw6N/itlaYS9RuRbOk7D9EY5SuPEFr9JMTRQHufuubkb/u+C8G7LKKKY0RYd7g2w6ee eUdsqBL7TeVb+xmhiCcgizFsdADqYgEoMeF7g=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.76.135 with SMTP id k7mr1156309obw.62.1327097550169; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:12:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.79.102 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:12:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4F19E563.8050506@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <20120110205143.6FDCF21F86F9@ietfa.amsl.com> <A44BB68F-19AB-462B-8A65-ACA855EA2ED1@vigilsec.com> <DE7B7ADC-F160-4633-8FD0-8453573D9830@vigilsec.com> <4F19DFCF.7090608@cs.tcd.ie> <CAP0PwYZDVF1oGdMikAkxNrx965+W-+uMS-0usRSX9sX8QMaiWg@mail.gmail.com> <4F19E563.8050506@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:12:30 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJNg7V+6q_qM7AvaPPCrc5p37_FV5JXW8dps88o6Sy+AJzjChw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Marshall Eubanks <marshall.eubanks@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: antitrust-policy@ietf.org, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Jorge Contreras <cntreras@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [antitrust-policy] how does that affect those with no competitive interests?
X-BeenThere: antitrust-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss the need for an antitrust or competition policy for the IETF." <antitrust-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/antitrust-policy>, <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/antitrust-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:antitrust-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/antitrust-policy>, <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 22:12:31 -0000

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Stephen Farrell
<stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
>
>
> On 01/20/2012 09:48 PM, Jorge Contreras wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Stephen Farrell
>> <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I have no skin in the money games around the IETF these
>>> days since I currently work in a University.
>>>
>>
>> You may not have a personal financial interest, but some universities
>> these
>> days make a lot of money from their patent licensing programs,
>
>
> We don't as it happens. But we do pay people to try (badly as
> it turns out;-)
>
>
>> and many
>>
>> more would like to.  Also, universities can and are sued for antitrust
>> violations, and there is no 'academic' immunity from these sorts of
>> claims.
>
>
> I've never heard of that. Got some examples that might be relevant
> to the IETF? (Not of IPR or being sued in general, but specific to
> anti-trust/competition law.)
>
>
>>  Thus, your employer/university is not that different than a company in
>> this regard.
>
>
> University is just one kind of employer. Some people self-fund
> in various ways.
>
> My point is that this policy assumes that all participants can
> in principle be anti-competition which seems like nonsense to
> me.
>
> I hate building a policy based on nonsense.
>

Do you think that Universities should not have to file IPR disclosures ? If
I get a patent on technology used in RFC X, can I decide that I don't
need to file
an IPR disclosure because I don't intend to charge royalties  with
anybody in the WG ?

I don't see the difference. The IETF shouldn't be in the job of making
these sorts of decisions.

Regards
Marshall

> S
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> ...
>>> Why can't I just ignore all this, since I'm not being
>>> anti-competitive even if I do some of these supposedly
>>> bad things?
>>>
>>
>> see above
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> antitrust-policy mailing list
>> antitrust-policy@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/antitrust-policy
>
> _______________________________________________
> antitrust-policy mailing list
> antitrust-policy@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/antitrust-policy