Re: [antitrust-policy] Antitrust BOF in Paris

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 03 February 2012 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E4521F8517 for <antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 08:41:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SxPd99vAghye for <antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 08:41:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A361F21F84EC for <antitrust-policy@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 08:41:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A5B4F240F7 for <antitrust-policy@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 11:42:06 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hwr9hCokmgBL for <antitrust-policy@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 11:41:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.2.104] (pool-96-241-165-215.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.241.165.215]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293A3F240F6 for <antitrust-policy@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 11:42:06 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <5994E8FA-F974-4698-86F6-CA7B5E332F47@vigilsec.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:41:37 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CBABD4D2-DCBD-4A23-95EF-02102D6F156D@vigilsec.com>
References: <5994E8FA-F974-4698-86F6-CA7B5E332F47@vigilsec.com>
To: antitrust-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Subject: Re: [antitrust-policy] Antitrust BOF in Paris
X-BeenThere: antitrust-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss the need for an antitrust or competition policy for the IETF." <antitrust-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/antitrust-policy>, <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/antitrust-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:antitrust-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/antitrust-policy>, <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:41:40 -0000

Thanks to Marshall Eubanks and John Levine for agreeing to serve as BOF chairs.  I am working on the write-up for the IESG and IAB.  I fully expect the BOF session to be approved.

Russ


On Feb 2, 2012, at 2:53 PM, Russ Housley wrote:

> I will probably hold a BOF in Paris to determine what action, if any, the IETF ought to take.  I am seeking a BOF chair.  If you are interested, please send me a note.
> 
> Russ