Re: [antitrust-policy] Who enforces an Antitrust Policy for the IETF

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 16 January 2012 03:05 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A03C021F8514 for <antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 19:05:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.57
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.57 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.029, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UUSs+AdOiqsy for <antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 19:05:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06A321F84C3 for <antitrust-policy@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 19:05:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by eaai13 with SMTP id i13so209967eaa.31 for <antitrust-policy@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 19:05:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Sly/UvIdURSI8GLzQ1MoQRE7VdOLGIyu8S/GuqmBiLU=; b=arPiHAOJTBIDCGIxzcWvWM95ItOvwssnRgHdzulj02RgyBcSv69g4tA7g5tLrfT+n3 aIidW5M+s9R9LzGxEl46h6HRPpbZeon+GWOfW/AODlZRHJdGyyXBMNSuLaF6pqWR5w4G AapjbQuVV1pSQjTLHPZFPo7Ix4DqYDQyiTPQ8=
Received: by 10.213.31.207 with SMTP id z15mr2362671ebc.33.1326683131822; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 19:05:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.1.1.4] ([121.98.251.219]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y12sm66576153eeb.11.2012.01.15.19.05.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 15 Jan 2012 19:05:31 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4F1393F3.4020908@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:05:23 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1201152008030.43561@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1201152008030.43561@joyce.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: antitrust-policy@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [antitrust-policy] Who enforces an Antitrust Policy for the IETF
X-BeenThere: antitrust-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss the need for an antitrust or competition policy for the IETF." <antitrust-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/antitrust-policy>, <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/antitrust-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:antitrust-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/antitrust-policy>, <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:05:33 -0000

On 2012-01-16 14:08, John R Levine wrote:
> Temporarily skipping over the question of what practical problem this
> is supposed to solve, I have some practical questions.
> 
>> If you observe behavior in violation of these guidelines at an IETF
>> meeting, please do not be silent; formally object.
> 
> What does that mean?  I hear two guys in the next row talking about
> product pricing.  I say, hey, you can't talk about that. They laugh at
> me and continue.  Now what?

I once heard someone interrupt a speaker by saying "If you don't
stop talking about that right now, I will leave the room, because
of advice from my anti-trust lawyer" (or words to that effect; this
was many years ago). Since this was a pretty prominent IETF
individual, the speaker shut up immediately.

The point was that by being in the room during such a conversation
you could possibly be deemed to have taken part in it. So I'd
say it would be in your own interest to object or walk out. IANAL.

> Or if this instruction or something like it goes into the Note Well,
> it's making every IETF attendee responsible for the behavior of
> everyone else.  If someone's hauled into court, they're going to say
> well, gee, the IETF specifically tells people to police anti-trust
> violations, nobody said anything to us about it, so the IETF agreed
> with what we did.
> 
> I have trouble imagining a problem this mess is supposed to solve that
> is anywhere near as ugly as the swamp it's leading into.

Yes, wouldn't it be better to position this item as a guideline on
how to avoid anti-trust issues rather than as a formal rule? The
responsibility should be clearly on the individuals, not on the IETF.

   Brian