IETF Logo Mail Archive

[antitrust-policy] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust/

Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Wed, 22 February 2023 13:47 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D5DC151532 for <antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 05:47:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qKdaIe88l4M2 for <antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 05:47:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailb2.tigertech.net (mailb2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.154]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DF2EC151531 for <antitrust-policy@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 05:47:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4PMHWm0rcJz1ntgb for <antitrust-policy@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 05:47:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1677073620; bh=fCPOQbj4nXL2fOcjI3oZfyAqLGHKS7n3hMTdrMyKTFE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:From; b=qfw1Y4EVP5BzrNgr4E8IuNIs6QhvINJWeP6iFRi2d1wK5zU4mAZOORWjUgLbivojR PeDtdBzwtdA37tp+8u+psvA+OItsYB2qAJPwa7Qv4QE0QNo92kg6YvSgzDSuM+a0EV MfB6+9fW+/huCKJvYXOGbYEaSiX9MLfI2fE91DZ4=
X-Quarantine-ID: <USHakqXUDCzi>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at b2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.21.74] (unknown [50.233.136.230]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4PMHWl55Bzz1nsgF for <antitrust-policy@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 05:46:59 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <dbc9ba5b-992b-eaf0-9cc7-6bf7e4526453@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 08:46:56 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: antitrust-policy@ietf.org
From: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/antitrust-policy/oOeS-5bLAcSBXnp8jh9kX7UfBuQ>
Subject: [antitrust-policy] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust/
X-BeenThere: antitrust-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss the need for an antitrust or competition policy for the IETF." <antitrust-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/antitrust-policy>, <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/antitrust-policy/>
List-Post: <mailto:antitrust-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/antitrust-policy>, <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 13:47:03 -0000

When this was dispatched, I said I would poke folks again.

The authors would very much appreciate comments, opinions, and better 
discussion of, this draft.  We would like to be able to submit a 
revision addressing concerns by the cutoff, to align with the ADs goal.

Thank you,

Joel

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status