Re: [Apn] should add the gap analysis for GENEVE (RFC8926)

"Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)" <pengshuping@huawei.com> Wed, 07 April 2021 06:52 UTC

Return-Path: <pengshuping@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: apn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 543993A42B5; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 23:52:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.817
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.817 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tGbnl6R-n8c3; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 23:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFE7C3A42B1; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 23:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml701-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.206]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FFZgv5Pwyz686Jj; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 14:47:07 +0800 (CST)
Received: from fraeml701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.50) by fraeml701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2106.2; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 08:52:12 +0200
Received: from DGGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.32) by fraeml701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA_P256) id 15.1.2106.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 08:52:11 +0200
Received: from DGGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.94]) by DGGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com ([fe80::89ed:853e:30a9:2a79%31]) with mapi id 14.03.0513.000; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 14:52:06 +0800
From: "Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)" <pengshuping@huawei.com>
To: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>, Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
CC: "apn@ietf.org" <apn@ietf.org>, "draft-peng-apn-scope-gap-analysis@ietf.org" <draft-peng-apn-scope-gap-analysis@ietf.org>, "nvo3@ietf.org" <nvo3@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Apn] should add the gap analysis for GENEVE (RFC8926)
Thread-Index: AdccUkbaMIFshIzhRci6WKwwf8chKwARl3NAAA20H/AAFwFhwAADW9NQAGCp+CAANUQHoAAw/EegAPhX2YAAaIV+QP//opGAgACq6QCAACLUgP/1LJ6w
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 06:52:06 +0000
Message-ID: <4278D47A901B3041A737953BAA078ADE19A93E39@dggeml512-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <SN6PR13MB2334C4F7D2306EF8907229F485699@SN6PR13MB2334.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <4278D47A901B3041A737953BAA078ADE199E8C18@dggeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <SN6PR13MB2334ACCFC53BBF53A8A0EB0685689@SN6PR13MB2334.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <4278D47A901B3041A737953BAA078ADE199F59E6@dggeml512-mbs.china.huawei.com> <SN6PR13MB23341B7846E18F07544E864785679@SN6PR13MB2334.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <4278D47A901B3041A737953BAA078ADE19A09DCA@DGGEML532-MBX.china.huawei.com> <SN6PR13MB23347F5FA76E953DC90B52E485649@SN6PR13MB2334.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <4278D47A901B3041A737953BAA078ADE19A29075@DGGEML532-MBX.china.huawei.com> <CABNhwV0nrdv7SBqCQDbEK+fW1tftziDZzgujmq3hFJ-BhHxPQw@mail.gmail.com> <4278D47A901B3041A737953BAA078ADE19A5C148@DGGEML532-MBX.china.huawei.com> <CABNhwV0nsm8KC56CwYgx41p5M+qrYzvzYSYGifwRM8KSquRhag@mail.gmail.com> <SN6PR13MB2334C3669FA0383A77D9EEFF857C9@SN6PR13MB2334.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <CABNhwV3qWve4su0C171UKB0V-pbrukRL77+qhKocBWNc8crnWw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABNhwV3qWve4su0C171UKB0V-pbrukRL77+qhKocBWNc8crnWw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.45.156.185]
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="_004_4278D47A901B3041A737953BAA078ADE19A93E39dggeml512mbschi_"; type="multipart/alternative"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apn/jdI6NGzYGK394in9pFVYJCLgye4>
Subject: Re: [Apn] should add the gap analysis for GENEVE (RFC8926)
X-BeenThere: apn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Application-aware Networking <apn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apn>, <mailto:apn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apn/>
List-Post: <mailto:apn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apn>, <mailto:apn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 06:52:23 -0000

Dear Gyan, Linda,

Thank you for the discussions!

I also agree with you that they are good cases for both DCI and IDC when using GENEVE and VxLAN-GPE to encapsulate packets added by DC Leaf nodes.

Thank you!

Best regards,
Shuping

From: Gyan Mishra [mailto:hayabusagsm@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 1, 2021 1:28 AM
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
Cc: Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) <pengshuping@huawei.com>; apn@ietf.org; draft-peng-apn-scope-gap-analysis@ietf.org; nvo3@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Apn] should add the gap analysis for GENEVE (RFC8926)

Hi Linda

Good point and I agree on DCI use case.

Thanks

Gyan

On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:23 AM Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com<mailto:linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>> wrote:
Gyan, ShuPing,

GENEVE and VxLAN-GPE encapsulated packets added by DC Leaf nodes can also be across different DCs, as long as the Leaf nodes in those DCs agree upon the meaning of the Metadata carried by the GENEVE/VxLAN-GPE headers.

Is the “agreement of the meaning of the metadata” what APN wants to achieve?

Linda Dunbar

From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com<mailto:hayabusagsm@gmail.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 12:12 AM
To: Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) <pengshuping@huawei.com<mailto:pengshuping@huawei.com>>
Cc: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com<mailto:linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>>; apn@ietf.org<mailto:apn@ietf.org>; draft-peng-apn-scope-gap-analysis@ietf.org<mailto:draft-peng-apn-scope-gap-analysis@ietf.org>; nvo3@ietf.org<mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Apn] should add the gap analysis for GENEVE (RFC8926)


Hi Shuping

My thoughts were that in any Data Center NVO3 environment the APN ID can be introduced by the host or in this case can be injected with a policy as metadata into the NVO3 overlay GENEVE or VXLN-GPE at the leaf tunnel endpoint that does the encapsulation / decapsulation of the overlay header.  The App ID encoded as metadata into a Group policy ID shim header for VXLAN-GPE and for GENEVE in the data plane extensibility in TLV options format for future innovations such as APN.

The APP ID would provide the signaling for fine grain network treatment and mapping to SRv6 SR-TE color mapping instantiation to achieve the desired application network treatment QOE.

Kind Regards

Gyan


On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:55 PM Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) <pengshuping@huawei.com<mailto:pengshuping@huawei.com>> wrote:
Hi Gyan,

Thank you for this information. I agree with your following statements.

"You can see some similarities between the two NVO3 overlays GENEVE and VXLAN-GPE both having the ability carry metadata and so would be perfect for DC environment to carry APN ID in the metadata field for the endpoint characteristics signaling to the network."

Any concrete use cases that could potentially use APN ID with either VxLAN-GPE or GENEVE?

I also copied NOV3. Hope experts could help here. Thank you!

Best reards,
Shuping



-----Original Message-----
From: Gyan Mishra [mailto:hayabusagsm@gmail.com<mailto:hayabusagsm@gmail.com>]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 4:54 PM
To: Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) <pengshuping@huawei.com<mailto:pengshuping@huawei.com>>
Cc: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com<mailto:linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>>; apn@ietf.org<mailto:apn@ietf.org>; draft-peng-apn-scope-gap-analysis@ietf.org<mailto:draft-peng-apn-scope-gap-analysis@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Apn] should add the gap analysis for GENEVE (RFC8926)

Hi Shuping

This is in similar context to use of VXLAN-GPE to carry APN APP ID marking information

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-nvo3-vxlan-gpe-11<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-nvo3-vxlan-gpe-11&data=04%7C01%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7Ce0bea3c9320f407f2ba108d8f40388fe%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637527643322516427%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=aZ5ap7Dp55Q7S3roP5TVIa9e0Tz63b3D9BLtNSWQ7yc%3D&reserved=0>


   The capabilities of the VXLAN-GPE protocol can be extended by
   defining next protocol "shim" headers that are used to implement new
   data plane functions.  For example, Group-Based Policy (GBP) or In-
   situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) metadata
   functionalities can be added as specified in
   [I-D.lemon-vxlan-lisp-gpe-gbp
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-nvo3-vxlan-gpe-11#ref-I-D.lemon-vxlan-lisp-gpe-gbp<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-nvo3-vxlan-gpe-11%23ref-I-D.lemon-vxlan-lisp-gpe-gbp&data=04%7C01%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7Ce0bea3c9320f407f2ba108d8f40388fe%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637527643322516427%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=QRUEjf7X%2Fj1ctXJFw%2BGibNZsjypfJXp%2BbfuM%2FYFNDaM%3D&reserved=0>>]
and
   [I-D.brockners-ippm-ioam-vxlan-gpe
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-nvo3-vxlan-gpe-11#ref-I-D.brockners-ippm-ioam-vxlan-gpe<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-nvo3-vxlan-gpe-11%23ref-I-D.brockners-ippm-ioam-vxlan-gpe&data=04%7C01%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7Ce0bea3c9320f407f2ba108d8f40388fe%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637527643322526419%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=f%2FHmrh6UBBqlb%2FO3VHzHV9THyosfZiquhd5R51Y6sB4%3D&reserved=0>>].


GENEVE

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8926<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftools.ietf.org%2Fhtml%2Frfc8926&data=04%7C01%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7Ce0bea3c9320f407f2ba108d8f40388fe%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637527643322526419%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=jkSRcdX7aD8lnZL7Xi%2F0fEdb%2Fm36xxXVJmBuXWLwemk%3D&reserved=0>

Work such as "VL2: A Scalable and Flexible Data Center Network" [VL2 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8926#ref-VL2<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftools.ietf.org%2Fhtml%2Frfc8926%23ref-VL2&data=04%7C01%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7Ce0bea3c9320f407f2ba108d8f40388fe%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637527643322536413%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=LyTsOdYLRhjEqNU0hzsvwa0cBLPs3AcONZz%2FK6n8wQ8%3D&reserved=0>>]
   and "NVO3 Data Plane Requirements" [NVO3-DATAPLANE <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8926#ref-NVO3-DATAPLANE<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftools.ietf.org%2Fhtml%2Frfc8926%23ref-NVO3-DATAPLANE&data=04%7C01%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7Ce0bea3c9320f407f2ba108d8f40388fe%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637527643322536413%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=jLyFl7x6bNgLQs12prSqcgXqiWrPDfQi2Wng0zXV06Q%3D&reserved=0>>] have described
   some of the properties that the data plane must have to support
   network virtualization.  However, one additional defining requirement
   is the need to carry metadata (e.g., system state) along with the
   packet data; example use cases of metadata are noted below.  The use
   of some metadata is certainly not a foreign concept -- nearly all
   protocols used for network virtualization have at least 24 bits of
   identifier space as a way to partition between tenants.  This is
   often described as overcoming the limits of 12-bit VLANs; when seen
   in that context or any context where it is a true tenant identifier,
   16 million possible entries is a large number.  However, the reality
   is that the metadata is not exclusively used to identify tenants, and
   encoding other information quickly starts to crowd the space.  In
   fact, when compared to the tags used to exchange metadata between
   line cards on a chassis switch, 24-bit identifiers start to look
   quite small.  There are nearly endless uses for this metadata,
   ranging from storing input port identifiers for simple security
   policies to sending service-based context for advanced middlebox
   applications that terminate and re-encapsulate Geneve traffic.



You can see some similarities between the two NVO3 overlays GENEVE and VXLAN-GPE both having the ability carry metadata and so would be perfect for DC environment to carry APN ID in the metadata field for the endpoint characteristics signaling to the network.

Kind Regards


Gyan

On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 10:26 PM Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) < pengshuping@huawei.com<mailto:pengshuping@huawei.com>> wrote:

> Thank you, Linda!
>
>
>
> When we start exploring the solution using GENEVE, we would need to
> know more about the use cases. Thank you for the information!
>
>
>
> BR,
>
> Shuping
>
>
>
> *From:* Linda Dunbar [mailto:linda.dunbar@futurewei.com<mailto:linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 23, 2021 11:16 AM
> *To:* Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) <pengshuping@huawei.com<mailto:pengshuping@huawei.com>>;
> draft-peng-apn-scope-gap-analysis@ietf.org<mailto:draft-peng-apn-scope-gap-analysis@ietf.org>; apn@ietf.org<mailto:apn@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* RE: should add the gap analysis for GENEVE (RFC8926)
>
>
>
> Shuping,
>
>
>
> Here is one example: for 5G Edge Computing, the edge devices have
> limited capacity. It can use GENEVE to carry information about the
> characteristics of the App, such as Types, Edge device information, etc.
>
> Linda
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) <pengshuping@huawei.com<mailto:pengshuping@huawei.com>>
> *Sent:* Sunday, March 21, 2021 8:39 PM
> *To:* Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com<mailto:linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>>;
> draft-peng-apn-scope-gap-analysis@ietf.org<mailto:draft-peng-apn-scope-gap-analysis@ietf.org>; apn@ietf.org<mailto:apn@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* RE: should add the gap analysis for GENEVE (RFC8926)
>
>
>
> Hi Linda,
>
>
>
> I was wondering about the concrete usage scenarios since I am not
> familiar with those with GENEVE. For example, in what scenario
> carrying what information to do what?
>
>
>
> Any references on the IoT case you mentioned about?
>
>
>
> Thank you!
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Shuping
>
>
>
> *From:* Linda Dunbar [mailto:linda.dunbar@futurewei.com<mailto:linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
> <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com<mailto:linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>>]
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 20, 2021 11:31 AM
> *To:* Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) <pengshuping@huawei.com<mailto:pengshuping@huawei.com>>;
> draft-peng-apn-scope-gap-analysis@ietf.org<mailto:draft-peng-apn-scope-gap-analysis@ietf.org>; apn@ietf.org<mailto:apn@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* RE: should add the gap analysis for GENEVE (RFC8926)
>
>
>
> ShuPing,
>
>
>
> GENEVE is to carry metadata associated with the packet. Metadata can
> be location information, compute information, service ID, App category, etc.
--

[图像已被发件人删除。]<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.verizon.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7Ce0bea3c9320f407f2ba108d8f40388fe%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637527643322546405%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=rpM6pXB%2Ftu1myw4XkGfeWIt%2FuGZruoBhSznmGGyqJFk%3D&reserved=0>

Gyan Mishra

Network Solutions Architect

Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com<mailto:gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>

M 301 502-1347

--

[图像已被发件人删除。]<http://www.verizon.com/>

Gyan Mishra

Network Solutions Architect

Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com<mailto:gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>

M 301 502-1347