IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Spam reporting over IMAP

SM <sm@resistor.net> Tue, 10 January 2012 00:22 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B9711E80C8 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 16:22:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rn78ox7eYcT8 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 16:22:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB10C11E8080 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 16:22:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0A0MExq024758 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 16:22:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1326154938; i=@resistor.net; bh=KO/ODfW+FoBse+g7hZapts8osqNcWIZJSlPw74PlN7w=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=3wlQ8RSAjZqM5ruLuWzzDx4HHPICO5dLCnZ1DM/VSMZ9fKtMXsczVBooI4D5dDeQk 62LF5DymWOPh9z2YSe3EB9h4JeB2G0QCqpHJB5Wn8QOiJYTFkgDUDeTaQ0d+crgMku gglOOxEz5ZrBoZqigLKHr/6p++DTVnLnhpJwamCk=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120109155713.0b022fe0@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:21:42 -0800
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C157A4@EXCH-C2.corp.cl oudmark.com>
References: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C157A4@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Spam reporting over IMAP
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:22:29 -0000

Hi Murray,
At 10:50 09-01-2012, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>interested in hearing something about it.  Otherwise, I believe I 
>should reply to them that the IETF is not currently doing work in 
>this area so their options include an ISE submission or something 
>AD-sponsored that goes for Experimental status or suchlike.

I don't think that the ISE will not take a draft with such a 
boilerplate.  There is also an IPR disclosure.  The draft needs a lot of work.

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email