Re: [apps-discuss] Request for Review - draft-yevstifeyev-rlogin-uri-00

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Thu, 03 February 2011 15:01 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DBA73A69B5 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 07:01:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.759
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.759 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.287, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SjFyTiFmO-ld for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 07:01:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1CF3A69B3 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 07:01:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MacBook-08.local (75-101-30-90.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [75.101.30.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p13F5FHa057173 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 08:05:15 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Message-ID: <4D4AC42A.7050303@vpnc.org>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 07:05:14 -0800
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
References: <4D4A8420.9070908@gmail.com> <4D4ABE26.7010700@vpnc.org> <4D4AC14D.3040608@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D4AC14D.3040608@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Request for Review - draft-yevstifeyev-rlogin-uri-00
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:01:54 -0000

On 2/3/11 6:53 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
> 03.02.2011 16:39, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> On 2/3/11 2:32 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> In accordance with RFC 4395 I'm asking to review the
>>> draft-yevstifeyev-rlogin-uri-00, that can be found here:
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yevstifeyev-rlogin-uri-00
>>>
>>> This document specifies the 'rlogin' URI scheme. The Rlogin protocol is
>>> defined in RFC 1282.
>>>
>>> Thank you for your time,
>>> Mykyta Yevstifeyev
>>>
>>> P.S. I've also posted such message on uri-review list. Mykyta
>>
>> This seems like another waste of time.
> I do not know why do you think so - Rlogin is quite widely-used
> alternative for Telnet on Unix systems.

Mykyta: do you read the responses to your earlier drafts? If you do, you 
would in fact know why I think so. It is the same reason as I and others 
have said the same thing about most/all your other proposals. If you 
don't read the responses, then I would very much encourage you to stop 
posting to any IETF WG lists: they are supposed to be discussions, not 
one-way announcements.