IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)

Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> Wed, 22 May 2013 17:43 UTC

Return-Path: <dave@cridland.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC37821F96AA for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 May 2013 10:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N5XWFhc+mlnv for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 May 2013 10:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-f52.google.com (mail-oa0-f52.google.com [209.85.219.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A0011E8104 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 May 2013 10:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id h1so3120075oag.11 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 May 2013 10:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cridland.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Vfapd0P9qpHzzWkgXzEDK/N3HYBIhEv1WqA3/VMsWeA=; b=ZXiLyClVie3LqA3o/x8bd+doO9vTs7//mVMWxf1Moyn4v9vIBDVqTdjRFYMjQllxtV A9h7SbqtpM1Y/zoB73HGT6ggDP/6eloyMI8thnuLk6M4qy6oI82OCcdQbMO8OkYsCqj6 z0k+5lH+YG8ZNhGplKPoKs3Srr2W1I/kJr/gA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=Vfapd0P9qpHzzWkgXzEDK/N3HYBIhEv1WqA3/VMsWeA=; b=naxVt6poOZgCdj+l+Wdbzwn5yrHVk8VYd2ACukNVFST5ZxR9KxX3LhWztfa2/OTTlw LoXJgxGeJ2L0D9MwAILoOX+gNIffeGP2yyo3p7P4+m7cBXPs0YIN2+KI2jBJnHZN1LBf /HKm3Cwt/ZhZfBuLW2cxPNBkuKAOYHjwE5r3Wqk0ItsRmbgW9mwMU/Fb0NSfsRGdUlI4 OeEGDrpSnD2+Gvwz+R8PYh05uuKmszg0RP3GFVBxJX81rKoomabYYk6Trys0r3FiM4pE 2HRU3Q71xjWq6XaemV0xGbEtDZm2QGApOq/XWAdeiBE3Sse0i/lKaN10n6yoJe+buCoB wLYw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.237.6 with SMTP id uy6mr4111365obc.31.1369244592922; Wed, 22 May 2013 10:43:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.62.146 with HTTP; Wed, 22 May 2013 10:43:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1305221841270.3056@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <61CB1D18-BABC-4C77-93E6-A9E8CDA8326B@vpnc.org> <CABP7RbcUJJoPJYdCOGSoa8fJfqj+R5RttjDtG5zXDirUV9OMQA@mail.gmail.com> <3638B63C-0E75-4E99-BF65-28F83DB856A6@vpnc.org> <CAMm+LwjKzHnOKDp0dmHN1Czes-f7tcJ2U1qz7S_HoSpcfKMyyA@mail.gmail.com> <04905D53-5022-4741-A2B6-9EE4593A4C65@tzi.org> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1305221841270.3056@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 18:43:12 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKHUCzx2MJxjO=CyEebZ9iheToE3hUL0rnJp+Bdk7S7+54p8qg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8ff24eaf92cff104dd521955"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl+Hz37X9nRCyTWeKewcfFwUknPLPK+8tJgX8lQmCuVDDCHYoOEExxGR13PJEWFByCzEYdl
Cc: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 17:43:18 -0000

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> wrote:

> Why not BSON or BJSON or UBJSON or MsgPack or ... ?
>

I was wondering whether Paul was going to do a compatible variant called
PHOFF, actually.

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status