Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme
Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Mon, 21 November 2011 10:21 UTC
Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD83B21F8B98 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 02:21:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.19
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.19 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.109, BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_24_48=1.219, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NSqo-sN7jkyU for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 02:21:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F43421F8B8D for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 02:21:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1321870908; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=7TUtcmfey+e8DY5a+yUN2f8RU4TBwtO+I6KkOaX1g94=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=HD+q2ZbgdKAf2ej1t/UAHTpcOsmD3BnB4O+FHiuWs02DU31hIWUCHzkxIhhnw6ntrqzo2F viwTAWrPTL20VUmD8EFmm/wYxCAgX8iIQsNCE9kWv8HuBJchc+BGThlCWQiHci4C+JQfvp hY7Um8SP7F/6R6m3V3HROYwm6dlykCA=;
Received: from [192.168.1.144] ((unknown) [62.3.217.253]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <TsomNwAFEEBe@rufus.isode.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:21:48 +0000
X-SMTP-Protocol-Errors: NORDNS
Message-ID: <4EC8B6D9.3080507@isode.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 08:14:17 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
To: "\"Mykyta Yevstifeyev (М. Євстіфеєв)\"" <evnikita2@gmail.com>
References: <4EC16815.80501@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EC16815.80501@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Apps-discuss list <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:21:56 -0000
On 14/11/2011 19:12, "Mykyta Yevstifeyev (М. Євстіфеєв)" wrote: > Hello, > > From minutes: > >> 09:05 draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme (chairs) >> >> Room consensus for registry to be FCFS with minimal doc via template. > > That is what the WG reached at the previous meeting and what is not > there currently is in the doc. Before it became a WG item, the > authors, ADs and me did have a discussion on this point, but there was > no agreement - that's why it became WG item. What I actually think is > that FCFS should be appropriate, but there is no point of adding a > registry entry given no specification available whereas the MUST > restriction is imposed. Recently Barry has sent me the following > proposal: to have the policy FCFS but make specification reference > mandatory for registration. Therefore, if there is nobody who > objects, I may change the following text in IANA Considerations: > > OLD: > >> The registration policy for new entries is "Specification Required", >> as defined in RFC 5226 [RFC5226]. Additionally, the following >> template MUST be provided by the registrant: > > NEW: > >> The registration policy for new entries is "First Come First >> Served", >> as defined in RFC 5226 [RFC5226]. Additionally, the following >> template MUST be provided by the registrant: > > OLD: > >> o Published specifications: A reference to the published >> specification for the registered token. > > NEW: > >> o Published specifications: A reference to the stable specification >> MUST be provided. I think allowing for specifications in an email message to IANA (or similar) should be sufficient, as long as IANA archives a copy of the registration on their website. Otherwise this looks Ok. >> The specification SHALL cover what the SPU >> with the token being registered ought to resolve to, and SHOULD >> cover other issues related to SPU usage. > Any comments are welcome.
- [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme Mykyta Yevstifeyev (М. Євстіфеєв)
- [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg-abo… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Mykyta Yevstifeyev (М. Євстіфеєв)
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Frank Ellermann
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-s… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-s… Mykyta Yevstifeyev (М. Євстіфеєв)
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Mykyta Yevstifeyev (М. Євстіфеєв)
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Mykyta Yevstifeyev (М. Євстіфеєв)
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Mykyta Yevstifeyev (М. Євстіфеєв)
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Frank Ellermann
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… t.petch
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Mykyta Yevstifeyev (М. Євстіфеєв)
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Jiankang YAO