Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and context

James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Wed, 29 May 2013 00:21 UTC

Return-Path: <jasnell@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA4911E80E4 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 May 2013 17:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.766
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.766 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.167, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OdiqsEXe4wfD for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 May 2013 17:21:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-f51.google.com (mail-oa0-f51.google.com [209.85.219.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C712211E80DE for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 May 2013 17:21:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id f4so10890422oah.10 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 May 2013 17:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=rAi3tbYr5I1k8A7021bMHbmqkXao5pDSREQPCU5lbrc=; b=wjXhV2DeV7oNsGMSzUGccoUu91eQq0TNIO5gbZAEuGHq/nxTyCXYXsT6dtQGRb1b1n ckogFNA6i2up29GCYQuMZ1OxtS8ITbaB1wOAkeo3XVls8l7E9N5NOegjt6nzf/uUO6Nk 4Eh6ovSchl2JQe2/p5TtwWfdimF9+P7C8rahzdhRrFPsimX5QAB85dTvnOwpBhbztqIE GtN8EQiNxiEcTrQASfyXSpaGieLTHez0Onn59lukgpf+TBaUR0xl81IMerXg8mtz57Z7 4cLqYZ2V7cQFGUEqFO4h2Y5kXXijIW2aBy0aUKLKp4VsMVDw1gx22G6VAnA5XCHAusFV jIhQ==
X-Received: by 10.182.227.133 with SMTP id sa5mr103421obc.96.1369786869445; Tue, 28 May 2013 17:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.3.137 with HTTP; Tue, 28 May 2013 17:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51a53d34.48b40e0a.70fc.1549SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
References: <4038B5FE76874C54A819A07FE192AEF8@gmail.com> <CABP7Rbd815stpCPLL5q9eVuxbHDW6NbGrBPdfjJbSywKFRRJ4g@mail.gmail.com> <51a53d34.48b40e0a.70fc.1549SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 17:20:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CABP7RbfbicAaXOpy8r3w-YVmLjM=APLDjhTohUgGnqAfkHm0dA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: link-relations@ieft.org, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and context
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 00:21:21 -0000

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Markus Lanthaler
<markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 1:09 AM, James M Snell wrote:
>> Based on an initial review (and a few days to process)... The
>> "context" link relation seems somewhat useful, "property" not so much.
>>
>> "context" is useful for things like processing json-ld. That strikes
>> me as being good.
>
> James, did you read all the discussion? Ioseb made it quite clear that his
> "context" is intended to be used completely different than JSON-LD's
> context. I'm still not sure I understand its semantics.
>

Yep, I saw that and purposefully chose to ignore it :-) ... given the
general definition of "context" given in the draft, use for json-ld
type scenarios is not ruled out.

- James

>
>
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
>
>
>