IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] IETF technical plenary: the end of application protocols

Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Mon, 21 March 2011 16:44 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 917AB28C0EB for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.569
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.569 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.030, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7p7S0UKre394 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7EB43A687B for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwl42 with SMTP id 42so7736832iwl.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=l9SiyqG/2YtpH2OhvRxbdio+FaYi2EkgNWJuEZ18zXE=; b=x6HFdPEmguio4LnCc+sqAgkNEMICt+Ak4g/7AZO9BUTjhFXQeXieSsN8FAGMepVuZu vISsl5jUFYEZyoyirEPuvSohYb41hXvNPpS2r0BGx3QQgzvIbCPPZ3orgZBzBvX2rXIx sf16XlWsTI+yMzgj1Goat19hG0pm5nlGJIaq8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ONeYiQ0JNna8fJgzWzN5SvAsmJMDprOWOmLE011UsUnUUF50x1ZemqH62Abwo7XI8m 48jg8CUswny3aU9st9uWjQX1+jwNfWbXEV9EdrZ/8o1t/+S8m5zZh8SXTc+8CE6I0zIV +qwmfLH8TuACgaA9Ydl5qyKDOdtA6h8mdEN9E=
Received: by 10.42.161.198 with SMTP id u6mr6991795icx.482.1300725817588; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:43:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.164.74 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4D877EDF.1090500@dcrocker.net>
References: <4D87612E.3090900@dcrocker.net> <AANLkTik_f-4E8eoWbY2SowzTUdk53L3oiLZwFgoFS20y@mail.gmail.com> <4D876B4C.5070706@dcrocker.net> <4D877D30.9090502@stpeter.im> <4D877EDF.1090500@dcrocker.net>
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:40:49 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTik6TEyXih9by+DLCqn+y6zAEPSP1pX0_kOb5j_8@mail.gmail.com>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] IETF technical plenary: the end of application protocols
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:44:26 -0000

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:37, Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:
> I think Claudio raises another fundamental point, namely the loss of
> interoperability.  The proposed model is a pure silo, with no apparent
> ability to have variations or incremental capabilities that build on the
> base, except by the single vendor providing the proprietary protocol.

Could you give a specific example?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email