IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Updating the status of SPF

Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net> Fri, 12 August 2011 18:23 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C48511E808B for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.749, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2XXE98wMEj1D for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 917FE11E8087 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.156] (adsl-68-122-69-114.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [68.122.69.114]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7CIOQcC023683 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:24:32 -0700
Message-ID: <4E456FD9.3050202@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:24:25 -0700
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
References: <20110809225415.89118.qmail@joyce.lan> <201108111351.34118.scott@kitterman.com> <4E456A8A.3050802@dcrocker.net> <201108121414.39555.scott@kitterman.com>
In-Reply-To: <201108121414.39555.scott@kitterman.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Updating the status of SPF
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:23:55 -0000

oh boy. sorry.  completely misposted.

sigh.

d/

On 8/12/2011 11:14 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Several people have made suggestions re: a charter to investigate updating RFC
> 4408.  I am working on a draft that integrates these comments and distils them
> down a bit.  From you comments though, I think you may have mistaken the
> DOMAINREP charter that Murray pointed to as an example for a draft charter for
> this new proposed work.  It's not.
>
> Please clarify?
>
> Scott K
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status