Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC for draft-ietf-appsawg-mime-default-charset

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 10 April 2012 14:33 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C562621F8582 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.312, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W+EEHTrH8DYh for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A212921F8670 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2012 14:33:44 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.140]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp012) with SMTP; 10 Apr 2012 16:33:44 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+zM2QvR6mzl8hdOiVS/8A7dwiUht7GeoT4XXltxz zZEqlMC4eKCEP7
Message-ID: <4F8444C8.2030709@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:33:44 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
References: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280C9874@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <01OE2UNN2HJ000ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com> <4F82B5F6.3050806@gmx.de> <01OE3UQGECV600ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com> <4F83EE7F.3070707@gmx.de> <01OE58YDHRAA00ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com>
In-Reply-To: <01OE58YDHRAA00ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC for draft-ietf-appsawg-mime-default-charset
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:33:46 -0000

On 2012-04-10 16:26, Ned Freed wrote:
>> On 2012-04-09 16:28, Ned Freed wrote:
>> > ...
>> >> I'm also not totally convinced that HTTPbis actually needs to
>> reference
>> >> this document at all; any opinions on this?
>> >
>> > Really ard to say without knowing how they deal with the iso-8859-1. I
>> > can see
>> > it being done in a way that doesn't need a reference. Or it could be
>> > done in a
>> > way where a reference would be helpful.
>
>> HTTPbis simply has stopped having a custom rule; it just delegates to
>> the applicable MIME specs. ->
>> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/20>
>
> Well, the change certainly needs to be noted as a change somewhere, don't
> you think? Otherwise people could easily assume that the rule is in there
> (and there's a lot of "there") somewhere.

<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p3-payload-19.html#rfc.section.C.p.3>

Best regards, Julian