Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-greylisting-05.txt
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Wed, 14 March 2012 19:50 UTC
Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 651B321F862F for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:50:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.603
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.603 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.004, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S7pwLY9wT-OR for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:50:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062D521F84E6 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:50:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXCH-MBX901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::addf:849a:f71c:4a82]) by EXCH-HTCAS901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::2966:6846:8d89:4681%12]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:50:48 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-greylisting-05.txt
Thread-Index: AQHM8ZI/NfjHLgzFXkyZMIHKh9XCxJZKvjfggB+V/gA=
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:50:47 +0000
Message-ID: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392808B2F9@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <20120222184536.6635.42117.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E003928042C26@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
In-Reply-To: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E003928042C26@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.20.2.121]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-greylisting-05.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:50:49 -0000
Some offlist feedback suggests adding this to the end of the list in Section 5:
7. An ADMD's own submission service (see [SUBMISSION]) SHOULD NOT
apply greylisting checks. Alternately, an ADMD could simply
exempt internal IP addresses from being greylisted, as described
in the previous point.
Seems reasonable to me. Others?
-MSK
- [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-gre… internet-drafts
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Dave Crocker