IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notification for draft-kerwin-file-scheme-13.txt

Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au> Sun, 04 January 2015 13:11 UTC

Return-Path: <phluid61@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F041A88B1 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Jan 2015 05:11:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.027
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.027 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fw_E-6NYX1_J for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Jan 2015 05:11:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-x229.google.com (mail-qg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 735811A88AF for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Jan 2015 05:11:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id e89so12747553qgf.28 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 04 Jan 2015 05:11:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4P/k71Wd+kTmx9B8c2ARpgKfexlcyzFO9YFYsjdctdk=; b=b+Fy8HbAZRUC3cFZxBuQX0Ymd2Q0bp105RnOR/UUtpQ6VM+TvHBsWOmPdOYvuWDiQN RU9i+cdSSa4gjRfsb2wdCzYrjWoqZUridKmW0tRjl8cwZHSDARXLSxYLng9iCeSVsVHN CIxkKJwazRSx/5IFeD4EzHH5fbN4jeHl/BMXgghnN+C1uicr35n7QFtxCnLOj2qzUREQ bT8aeATc64Lypw73j1AjfLa5zPz51jKxOMqHLkBfhsrSCWZjca+t7y1mQnxGEHSIEDVu aS4JciFrQOrcUe8eWQWutXDoMK2WQNyjWvA9fWp79I7iQZL6mKOPvGe6oheusMSV6QTm 09fg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.107.73 with SMTP id g67mr70065584qgf.103.1420377082637; Sun, 04 Jan 2015 05:11:22 -0800 (PST)
Sender: phluid61@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.93.98 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Jan 2015 05:11:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54A583DD.9010602@intertwingly.net>
References: <20140926010029.26660.82167.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <EAACE200D9B0224D94BF52CF2DD166A425A68A90@ex10mb6.qut.edu.au> <CACweHNBEYRFAuw9-vfeyd_wf703cvM3ykZoRMqAokRFYG_O7hQ@mail.gmail.com> <DM2PR0201MB09602B351692D424A49C6B0DC3650@DM2PR0201MB0960.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <CACweHNBN_Bv=jeXQ_VwXi2HzHKNEwZJ1NiF-BJJo_9-mhO60gQ@mail.gmail.com> <54A5730C.8040501@ninebynine.org> <54A583DD.9010602@intertwingly.net>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 23:11:22 +1000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4ICCr9jo8ugemU006gvOovWnLxA
Message-ID: <CACweHNAyffE+mCT1+80XsF6zkWwuGNvb030njmywfA82j41h2g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113a7c027534c1050bd34f67"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/1WSek_RDkXQftPjH5yrC5XE466I
Cc: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notification for draft-kerwin-file-scheme-13.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 13:11:25 -0000

On 2 January 2015 at 03:29, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:

> On 01/01/2015 11:17 AM, Graham Klyne wrote:
>>
>>
>> For some reason, I didn't see Larry's original comment.  Probably
>> overwhelmed. But I've just looked at
>> https://specs.webplatform.org/url/webspecs/develop/ and:
>>
>> (a) noticed the same issue that Matthew just noted about the "big red
>> box".
>>
>
> I added that big red box.  I encourage you to follow the following links:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014OctDec/0526.html
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/
> KyxFLw2FCwv7CSpiWAmLr8Ha7vc
>
> It is my hope that by working together I can feel confident enough to
> remove that red box.  As it is, I don't feel that either spec matches
> widely deployed applications.
> ​
> ​
>
>
>
So... are you advocating we make file: non-standard? That seems to be what
both linked posts suggest. That would go with Dave Thaler's earlier
proposition, that we move it to Historical, and get rid of it.

Not exactly what I had in mind coming into this.


-- 
  Matthew Kerwin
  http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status