[apps-discuss] RFC 2388 (multipart/form-data)

Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> Fri, 12 July 2013 17:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ian@hixie.ch>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA6611E8171 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:40:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P29q8cnv+MqC for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:40:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a69.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47ABB11E810E for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:40:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a69.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a69.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98DCC40119C04 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:39:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=hixie.ch; h=date:from:to :subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=hixie.ch; bh=3C cT/KbMTRLHKjmRCfC2Cr17S1Y=; b=QXW3fTGq99QZA9QeZ1mf6JN6dO2sQ76YHV pcB05/vcK6gyqZJm4xtRljDZlNb1bXKtoFp0ggZ+KFFyHFvURsq79YUwH7xtoyzF UbIclU//RiCS9INtH33ZnZQhP0HjQ8CCvF52ij/U9sGeYvjm7OGx0LKcXI4u1uSO R7PJQ0uPg=
Received: from ps20323.dreamhostps.com (ps20323.dreamhost.com [69.163.222.251]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: internal@index.hixie.ch) by homiemail-a69.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D0DA40119C01 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:39:43 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 17:39:43 +0000
From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1307121736400.22191@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
Content-Language: en-GB-hixie
Content-Style-Type: text/css
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 06:12:04 -0700
Subject: [apps-discuss] RFC 2388 (multipart/form-data)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 17:40:19 -0000

Hi,

Do you know if there is anyone working on fixing RFC2388? People keep 
asking me to update the HTML spec to just define it all inline rather than 
deferring to the RFC since the RFC leaves a lot of stuff underdefined, but 
I don't have the bandwidth to spec all that myself at this point.

e.g.:
   https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16909
   https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19879

Other feedback:
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-whatwg-archive/2012Oct/0204.html
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-whatwg-archive/2012Jul/0037.html
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-whatwg-archive/2012May/0003.html

I asked Larry Masinter if he was still maintaining the RFC, but he said he 
wasn't, and suggested I ask here to find out who was maintaining it now.

Thanks in advance,
--
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'