[apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-pcp-upnp-igd-interworking-07

"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com> Mon, 08 April 2013 17:15 UTC

Return-Path: <vkg@bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9155021F93EE for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 10:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tQRncgVcSpdy for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 10:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com (ihemail1.lucent.com [135.245.0.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E5F21F9355 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 10:15:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usnavsmail2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.10]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id r38HFA2c020954 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 8 Apr 2013 12:15:10 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail-ce2.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by usnavsmail2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id r38HF9CB000781 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 8 Apr 2013 12:15:10 -0500
Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com (vkg.lra.lucent.com [135.244.22.26]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id r38HF8S1007377; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 12:15:09 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <5162FBD4.7010701@bell-labs.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 12:18:12 -0500
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Organization: Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: draft-ietf-pcp-upnp-igd-interworking.all@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.33
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.10
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-pcp-upnp-igd-interworking-07
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 17:15:22 -0000

I have been selected as the Applications Area Directorate reviewer for
this draft (for background on appsdir, please see ​
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/ApplicationsAreaDirectorate ).

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-pcp-upnp-igd-interworking-07
Title: Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) Internet Gateway Device (IGD)-Port
        Control Protocol (PCP) Interworking Function
Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
Review Date: Apr-08-2013
IETF Last Call Date: Not known
IESG Telechat Date: Not known

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard.
A few issues that should be looked at before publication are listed
below.

Major Issues: 0
Minor Issues: 1
Nits: 2

Minor:
------
- S1, Figure 1: Where is the IGD in this figure?  Is it co-located
  with the UPnP-PCP IWF?  You may want to be more explicit about
  the location of the IGD since the remaining text depends on this
  context.  Note that it may be clear to you where the IGD is, but it
  may not be so apparent to readers not up to speed with this area.

Nits:
-----
- S1, first and second paragraphs: You may want to expand IGD when it is
  first encountered in the first paragraph.  You do the expansion in the
  second occurrence (paragraph two, bullet one).  Just move it up.

  Additionally, you may want to expand IWF when it first appears below
  Figure 1.

- S5.6.1, in the "Discussion" indentation: Is it "Vuzz" or do you mean
  "Vuze"?

Thanks,

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com
Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/