IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] BCP, AS, something else? (was RE: Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg-greylisting-03)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Tue, 21 February 2012 21:36 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E37C21E8087 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:36:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.957
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.957 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.019, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QG43KaXt8LpG for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:36:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F31721E8085 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:36:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ghbg16 with SMTP id g16so3615173ghb.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:36:42 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com designates 10.236.145.230 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.145.230;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com designates 10.236.145.230 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.145.230]) by 10.236.145.230 with SMTP id p66mr37806704yhj.27.1329860202257 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:36:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=pAAKyff79sDoREyeKw5s8LMLVQ2luzsHPuYUiuez+g0=; b=jnS9p8RNrD3aFOYugfIWzwJygSDr1DNKzSJvCPcafQu8jo4D+0lSCP4AaCcXGZGKit WH2xrskFRKCffmyh4ZJNQWinBUbcq9QaHBbWrcyy/Hf9fo1+rv1EgIJzlctnlBwI8vRU MBgrGrH4Wg1A1f4i/AOZRdqiSvas1IucO5AnU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.145.230 with SMTP id p66mr29406366yhj.27.1329860202204; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:36:42 -0800 (PST)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.147.58.20 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:36:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C9A7DE4B@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20120215194417.098a0438@elandnews.com> <4F3D0EE5.9060008@dcrocker.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20120216143635.09cc8660@resistor.net> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C9A7DDD4@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120216201037.0901f720@resistor.net> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C9A7DDDD@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C9A7DE4B@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:36:42 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8_CXJlZduPI0V9f7gOBXG4ir6aI
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVA6MtVrL6t1=Nh42YdYnHW==0M2+9EUqVzzG+4i-yEW5Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf3040eb32f40d5604b9803430"
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] BCP, AS, something else? (was RE: Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg-greylisting-03)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:36:50 -0000

>
> This document started out as a BCP, but with some guidance from Pete and a
> re-read of RFC2026, cited above, I believe this qualifies as an
> Applicability Statement, so I changed its requested status accordingly.  (I
> should have pointed this out when I posted the revision; sorry about that.)
>  SM disagrees; his is the middle cited text there.
>

For the record, as incoming AD, I concur that this fits fine as an AS, and
that that target status works better for this document than BCP does.  It
describes how to apply SMTP to a particular use case.

That said, this is a working-group document, and at the first level its
target status has to reflect working-group consensus.  So please, weigh in.

Barry (as chair/AD)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email