Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-nottingham-http-browser-hints-01.txt

Bjartur Thorlacius <svartman95@gmail.com> Sun, 29 May 2011 22:48 UTC

Return-Path: <svartman95@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2019BE0700 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 May 2011 15:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z2KupsJyBqCE for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 May 2011 15:48:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yi0-f44.google.com (mail-yi0-f44.google.com [209.85.218.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BAEAE06FE for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 May 2011 15:48:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yic13 with SMTP id 13so1798094yic.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 May 2011 15:48:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=rXijujTDe6T0vr7l51dYEUyJdOJyzQMK/SBUF7EiZj0=; b=q7Iv0h1qHYGnM8hPEfiBYSMP1TCqDj1/iO4zktmrGr+DK1/QZlHBZh2o5PXf4b5m5F JNnC+P5J0jgYqRt4x/yhI0Vx3aPqli/OdV60XfFRFks3TW0KrkhFRoVoEsPUR2CxCv2h xwUb2EX49vJtyobdoFqRmBDeUJ/r5dhJ766oI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=cml60du/2i/K9LmA0JMaS+HmoEwqc09bzpOEWhdPHGChBfR4B8ksCV+QIB26TuvvM1 xJuj3FOyTbcx8f2L8BF0LaaHloV77K/PaeX8LDvnNHlE3/e6kLLe9dbDBsBJLLWkj5tr 4woCHi79KGYp8uQ1vVhawBPaBsPl/D7wex+7g=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.76.197 with SMTP id b45mr5301422yhe.147.1306709330800; Sun, 29 May 2011 15:48:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.47.228 with HTTP; Sun, 29 May 2011 15:48:50 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 22:48:50 +0000
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=s9jHu=_+VVTxAvdEts=9Dts2h0Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bjartur Thorlacius <svartman95@gmail.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-nottingham-http-browser-hints-01.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 12:37:33 -0000

The current draft specifies that browser hints are a resource
identified by the URI "/.well-known/browser-hints" resolved relative
to an URI scheme, an authority section, and an empty path (assuming I
understand the draft correctly). I believe this to be harmful, as the
URI shares the authority section with other URIs, but is in fact named
by IETF (even though IETF doesn't maintain the resource).
Have you considered the possibility of passing this information as a
response to another method than GET, e.g. OPTIONS?
If creating a new method or reusing OPTIONS isn't an option (no pun
intended), could a new URI scheme be used, so that the hints are still
assigned an URI, without polluting the namespace supposedly given to
domain name registrants, and potentially clashing with existing or
future URIs.