Re: [apps-discuss] draft-nottingham-json-home-02

Nick Lombard <ietf@jigsoft.co.za> Thu, 09 May 2013 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@jigsoft.co.za>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 142AB21F84D4 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 May 2013 10:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.437
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z2Erf0Bgl4IH for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 May 2013 10:51:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22d.google.com (mail-ob0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E290021F92FC for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 May 2013 10:51:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f173.google.com with SMTP id 6so3268667oba.32 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 May 2013 10:51:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jigsoft.co.za; s=google; h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=Px5GBbyWPLYzPZ7yKgeyzn+j/NQxm9bgWsx1PDz8STU=; b=j4BUV1p9Nn4sOfbqRTm5vcobEwA6Vyouz/RReAWkMlhK0aFM1zt0dxpccbmY5dAHI9 lKdAeb1P+cST7h6lHR2OiG/lnU5ipzlUSsu2eB95KAnt4pRCvPaVBfncL/DeTjIXTy4A alZbte0vWXNDMNi+GxCtACm9TjvhEVZZQWCKo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=Px5GBbyWPLYzPZ7yKgeyzn+j/NQxm9bgWsx1PDz8STU=; b=HNyNtCj6VXsr+DsUl1rZv0ZCOkHvP9Rpg9zCehmCR7OueVKFa6VoUPF+6NiMcSwT52 Gi3Ni5mGOJpKtI/P78kACcpK+ws2707SskSXwcMqI24H9hCAQncvWuNire7bAOC5d/kk FMIrh7N2ZuzLslCku1+WkWkRt9Vvf89qugeZG16HghsiNFXqTUMP5ChPOECxPx4I/zOu 4YdiMBL6y2d5f4ZG52J82cq7/o1FZ0kzDoZjYDcosuvkX254jddatHHvGXyjva/FyUVu HDoJ81/DqpPmhBs/exAAV+p+TPRprkjfxklXUnygmO6SZhO6ZNeBF/HmtllUa3FijGVQ 5I6A==
X-Received: by 10.182.32.34 with SMTP id f2mr4923577obi.86.1368121878387; Thu, 09 May 2013 10:51:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: nick@jigsoft.co.za
Received: by 10.182.233.102 with HTTP; Thu, 9 May 2013 10:50:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <F922078B-323B-4956-A932-E620CC5120AB@mnot.net>
References: <CAOp_J8nfdqTxXJA8siTyhjTaxuhGYs9wWTMuFu2hCe6mccTQig@mail.gmail.com> <F922078B-323B-4956-A932-E620CC5120AB@mnot.net>
From: Nick Lombard <ietf@jigsoft.co.za>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 19:50:58 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: CNoui3dhx6Dapk7qolJVY5kgWnk
Message-ID: <CAMzJ9_o9XGQke-o5WfhB9HcHQa6BQ_=kzMpO28v+oNdEay6Sgw@mail.gmail.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013a079492311804dc4cb231"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmOnk8+XhdnjAP+KVcYwpizWH67fsr50mL5zrbKfO0cfYU6c4eRskrmKhUW73y1ss4+BiDd
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] draft-nottingham-json-home-02
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 17:51:22 -0000

Hi

On 30 April 2013 02:59, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

>
> Oh, it's still active, just a slow burner. Once we get HTTP/1.1 to bed,
> i'll be spending some more time on it.
>

@Mark I can help dust off the cob-webs and keep it simmering on track for
you while you are otherwise occupied, if that would help.

Besides lining things up with Erik Wilde's XML clone is there anything
anyone would like to add at this point?

If memory serves I created a project on GitHub at some point for an open
source reference implementation, although I can't find it now but that is
easily rectified. I know there were requests previously made for this on
list. Is it still something of interest, is there anything specific which
you would like to see implemented? @Ted M. Young perhaps you have something
you can contribute already, would you like to be involved? If anyone else
has some spare time to squeeze off with an interest to see a reference
implementation materialise, lets hear from you too.

Many hands makes lighter load.

nickl