IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] SenML

"Kaebisch, Sebastian" <sebastian.kaebisch.ext@siemens.com> Wed, 29 February 2012 16:27 UTC

Return-Path: <sebastian.kaebisch.ext@siemens.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A5EB21F872E for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 08:27:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RsIbZ2zfvJIJ for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 08:27:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from thoth.sbs.de (thoth.sbs.de [192.35.17.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 648CF21F86D3 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 08:27:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.siemens.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thoth.sbs.de (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q1TGR09o031026 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:27:00 +0100
Received: from DEMCHP99ET2MSX.ww902.siemens.net (demchp99et2msx.ww902.siemens.net [139.25.131.241]) by mail1.siemens.de (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q1TGR0oS032571 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:27:00 +0100
Received: from DEMCHP99E55MSX.ww902.siemens.net ([169.254.2.35]) by DEMCHP99ET2MSX.ww902.siemens.net ([139.25.131.241]) with mapi; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:27:00 +0100
From: "Kaebisch, Sebastian" <sebastian.kaebisch.ext@siemens.com>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:26:59 +0100
Thread-Topic: Re: [apps-discuss] SenML
Thread-Index: Acz2/vXlXDP9tp+cTieHnmMRc22PWg==
Message-ID: <1CE2FB42E90B614C98BC172FAB12D4C002D3FCFF8A@DEMCHP99E55MSX.ww902.siemens.net>
Accept-Language: de-DE
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: de-DE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] SenML
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:27:03 -0000

Hi all, 

I have some improvement suggestions concerning the XSD which is used for senML EXI coding. Right now, there are some types defined which are not optimal for small embedded devices. E.g., attribute "t", "ut", and "ver" are typed as "integer". I think, "int" will be enough in that context. Furthermore, I would like to suggest to make some changes in the XSD definitions (e.g., using enumerations) to make the EXI message instances more compact. I will prepare an XSD proposal for the next week for further discussions.

Best regards
Sebastian Käbisch

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status