Return-Path: <sebastian.kaebisch.ext@siemens.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
 with ESMTP id 3A5EB21F872E for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Wed, 29 Feb 2012 08:27:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.249
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RsIbZ2zfvJIJ for
 <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 08:27:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from thoth.sbs.de (thoth.sbs.de [192.35.17.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com
 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 648CF21F86D3 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>;
 Wed, 29 Feb 2012 08:27:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.siemens.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thoth.sbs.de
 (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q1TGR09o031026 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>;
 Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:27:00 +0100
Received: from DEMCHP99ET2MSX.ww902.siemens.net
 (demchp99et2msx.ww902.siemens.net [139.25.131.241]) by mail1.siemens.de
 (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q1TGR0oS032571 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3
 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>;
 Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:27:00 +0100
Received: from DEMCHP99E55MSX.ww902.siemens.net ([169.254.2.35]) by
 DEMCHP99ET2MSX.ww902.siemens.net ([139.25.131.241]) with mapi;
 Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:27:00 +0100
From: "Kaebisch, Sebastian" <sebastian.kaebisch.ext@siemens.com>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:26:59 +0100
Thread-Topic: Re: [apps-discuss] SenML
Thread-Index: Acz2/vXlXDP9tp+cTieHnmMRc22PWg==
Message-ID: <1CE2FB42E90B614C98BC172FAB12D4C002D3FCFF8A@DEMCHP99E55MSX.ww902.siemens.net>
Accept-Language: de-DE
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
acceptlanguage: de-DE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] SenML
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols
 <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>,
 <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>,
 <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:27:03 -0000

Hi all,=20

I have some improvement suggestions concerning the XSD which is used for se=
nML EXI coding. Right now, there are some types defined which are not optim=
al for small embedded devices. E.g., attribute "t", "ut", and "ver" are typ=
ed as "integer". I think, "int" will be enough in that context. Furthermore=
, I would like to suggest to make some changes in the XSD definitions (e.g.=
, using enumerations) to make the EXI message instances more compact. I wil=
l prepare an XSD proposal for the next week for further discussions.

Best regards
Sebastian K=E4bisch