[apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-25

"Jiankang YAO" <yaojk@cnnic.cn> Fri, 12 April 2013 07:57 UTC

Return-Path: <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D1221F8D12 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -96.836
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-96.836 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, J_CHICKENPOX_54=0.6, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7WyW2PJIRMjZ for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cnnic.cn (unknown []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A47D521F8BE4 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:57:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-EYOUMAIL-SMTPAUTH: yaojk@cnnic.cn
Received: from unknown127.0.0.1 (HELO lenovo47e041cf) ( by with SMTP; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:57:32 +0800
Message-ID: <6E0E2EDBD7BF49FF94AD9DBA96C88E07@LENOVO47E041CF>
From: Jiankang YAO <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org, thomas@netapp.com
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:57:32 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Cc: iesg@ietf.org
Subject: [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-25
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 07:57:45 -0000

I have been selected as the Applications Area Directorate reviewer 
for this draft (for background on appsdir, please 
Please resolve these comments along with any other comments 
you may receive. Please wait for direction from your document 
shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Protocol

Reviewer: Jiankang Yao
Review Date: April 12, 2013


This draft is very long. I mainly focus on section 12 of this document.This part is about internationalization.

Major issue:none.

Minor issue:

  This part refer to ISO.10646-1.1993, which is almost same to UNICODE 3.2. The RFC3454 referred by this document is also based on ISO.10646-1.1993. The problem is that the UNICODE has been updated to Version 6.2 from version 3.2. RFC3454 may not work for UNICODE 6.2.
  Should this document be updated to refer to the new version of UNICODE?


Best Regards

Jiankang Yao