IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Pete and Barry: now it is up to you (was: draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00 and our lawn -- feedback?)

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Mon, 17 February 2014 19:46 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF5A1A01B0 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:46:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mYHVn7e9HIEd for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:46:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 285EC1A0177 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:46:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-98-67.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.67]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.8/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s1HJk1e1013538 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 17 Feb 2014 12:46:03 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host 50-1-98-67.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.67] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwbnGYv6LR3muS+j0WTUT-yF4sOCyPSzWbVS4z5Ryr=w-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:46:00 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <50CEC5B9-5B65-40E4-A176-5EAB3FE31B49@vpnc.org>
References: <20140216035539.2686.qmail@joyce.lan> <53009C37.3030009@ninebynine.org> <0DB8F884-5E50-4DA2-AD0B-C07EBB2C8F47@vpnc.org> <CAL0qLwbnGYv6LR3muS+j0WTUT-yF4sOCyPSzWbVS4z5Ryr=w-w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/4DbDJn-qIlzmLPqfdzTU-4Y0lIg
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Pete and Barry: now it is up to you (was: draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00 and our lawn -- feedback?)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:46:14 -0000

On Feb 17, 2014, at 11:07 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> wrote:

> Feedback about the content of draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-get-off-my-lawn is perfectly appropriate for this list.  

I believe what I said is feedback:

> draft-ietf-weirds-using-http-08 has a protocol that would not be acceptable if draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-get-off-my-lawn were already a BCP.

That is, if Mark had gotten grumpier a year earlier and we already made draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-get-off-my-lawn a BCP, it would *prevent* the WEIRDS WG from doing what is in draft-ietf-weirds-using-http-08, assuming that the Apps ADs wanted to enforce it. A BCP full of MUSTs that are ignored does not sound like a good idea.

Asking Pete and Barry to give direction now to this WG and/or to WEIRDS seems appropriate, given the mere timing issue.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email