Re: httpbis vs yam meeting slots in Stockholm

[Alexey Melnikov <[e-mail]>]

Mark Nottingham wrote:

> Moving HTTPbis to Monday or Tuesday would lead to a chair 
> availability  problem as well.

Oops. Sorry about that.

> Furthermore, the agenda has been marked as FINAL, and people tend to  
> book travel once that happens.

Well, don't get me started on that ;-). YAM has appeared in the only 
version of the agenda I saw, so I couldn't possibly have commented on 
the conflict before that.

> It'd be best if we could move HTTPbis to another slot on Thursday;  
> e.g., morning I

This wouldn't work, as there are no room available.
And there are no Apps area slots, so we can't swap anything. We could 
try to swap slots with WG in other areas, but this might create other 
conflicts elsewhere.
Also note that the morning I is 2.5 hours, not 2 hours allocated for 
HTTPBIS.

> and afternoon II don't have any obvious conflicts (at  least to me), 
> and afternoon II looks to have available space (although  I suspect 
> that's because congresshall A and B are being prepared for  the 
> plenary, although I note congresshall C is in use).

It is also only 1 hour long.

> Cheers,
>
> On 10/07/2009, at 4:04 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
>
>> --On Thursday, July 09, 2009 17:47 +0100 Alexey Melnikov
>> <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>>>> We should try and get this conflict fixed.
>>>
>>> Can we swap httpbis with either:
>>> Monday, 13:00-15:00 (idnabis)
>>
>> Moving IDNABIS would set off a whole series of other problems
>> including, I believe, unavailability of the Chair.
>>
>> FWIW, given the concerns about the content rules for URIs and
>> IRIs, a conflict between HTTPBIS and IDNABIS should also be on
>> the "must avoid" list.
>