Re: [apps-discuss] +exi

What might also be interesting to understand is how register +exi would be
different than registering other binary XML formats.  Would we need
+fastinfoset and +BiM and so on?

I'm not opposed to +exi if that helps in decoding the data somehow, but it
doesn't seem like it would add any more value than signaling the media type
and indicating the content encoding.  In fact, the latter might be used to
indicate various modes of EXI, if that was necessary.

Paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:apps-discuss-
> bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Peter Saint-Andre
> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 11:16 AM
> To: Zach Shelby
> Cc: paduffy@cisco.com; Mark Nottingham; Thomas Herbst; apps-
> discuss@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] +exi
> 
> On 12/16/11 12:24 AM, Zach Shelby wrote:
> > On Dec 14, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Carine Bournez wrote:
> >
> >> In the schema-informed mode the encoder and the decoder use a schema,
> >> the EXI 1.0 version specifies XML schema informed grammars.
> >> The reference to that schema is carried in the EXI header. The format
> >> of that "schemaId" is not specified for 1.0 processors, it can be
> >> whatever is practical for the application. It is *optional* in the
> >> EXI header, even when a schema is in use: applications can also
> >> "share" this information out of band. EXI 1.0 is intentionally
> >> liberal on a number of details and defers them to the application
> >> level, so that it can support a large range of use cases.
> >
> > Right. It is exactly these kinds of applications that are using schema
> > informed mode natively (without intermediate XML), where the
> > application/foo+exi media type helps to determine this information out
> > of band. When registering foo+exi, the schema information should be
> > included in the registration.  In addition to SE2 mentioned so far,
> > also our specification on SenML
> > [http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jennings-senml-07] is requesting an
> > application/senml+exi media type. Both of these media types are aimed
> > at constrained embedded devices.
> 
> Zach, thanks for clarifying the matter. Perhaps it would make sense for
> someone to write a brief I-D describing the rationale for media types
> with the +exi suffix and the information required to register such
> types.
> 
> Peter
> 
> --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> https://stpeter.im/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss