Re: [apps-discuss] RFC5451bis processing

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 31 March 2013 23:29 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A4C921F84AD for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.084
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.084 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.114, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YVT3Nz4btTFs for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:29:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5349721F84A6 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:29:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 56503 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2013 23:29:18 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 31 Mar 2013 23:29:18 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=5158c6cd.xn--btvx9d.k1303; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=8WDUPefHjX1FFTe3Tyw39xyO5xhoP8mv1o/3PZj1HV8=; b=XRuRFHxK9vdQPCm/aYl0StfpHr8rVLPYQxzL1Y8tH5+zNy7GAoSeDnpVSXY+kMBq7rpI49pZmDGp+LXH18xe6xrjRAoJwEAyZKT6gc6pbDxNrzu2WxY9T38gXqAWaMBHZdd8XocZkTzmZCuE7AVkTmwjD2v6vHKb09lFZIkcwkc=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=5158c6cd.xn--btvx9d.k1303; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=8WDUPefHjX1FFTe3Tyw39xyO5xhoP8mv1o/3PZj1HV8=; b=KVcvoaBas+34o5Islv5gRNVMHpa2hDy4Z3DUfVbAqPK2OJJXaMBwQg97wFVgXUi7cvPfOUKc3GaDRJdB743QTR3YM8qIUfxDC8FwOrMr9kMV8lnJDXvC6jIYDCaeYjW1VZA/FD708gbWu4phoKHS0XCpz72OdAaPR+z2uK/mRnc=
VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org
Date: 31 Mar 2013 23:28:55 -0000
Message-ID: <20130331232855.87940.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130331154836.0a822628@elandnews.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Cc: sm+ietf@elandsys.com
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] RFC5451bis processing
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 23:29:19 -0000

>Can RFC 5451bis be processed through appsawg?  I'll volunteer to 
>shepherd if it helps.

Seems reasonable to me.  It's clearly an apps topic, and quite a few
people who are familiar with the A-R header it describes seem to be
here.