Re: [apps-discuss] Designating Apps Area related RFCs as Historic (was: Designating SUPDUP-related RFCs as Historic

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Thu, 07 July 2011 16:27 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856BE1F0C3F for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 09:27:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GA+zH4TsXWxr for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 09:27:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091501F0C3E for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 09:27:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by malice.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.71]) with mapi; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 09:27:29 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>, Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 09:27:28 -0700
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] Designating Apps Area related RFCs as Historic (was: Designating SUPDUP-related RFCs as Historic
Thread-Index: Acw8wkrqjqyewUdjT7il/oXpnP6vWQAAC/JQ
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F134EBC4BB7@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <4E158722.60101@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20110707031904.04dcc150@resistor.net> <4E1594B2.9060409@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20110707072837.055b9700@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20110707072837.055b9700@resistor.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Designating Apps Area related RFCs as Historic (was: Designating SUPDUP-related RFCs as Historic
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 16:27:30 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of SM
> Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 8:39 AM
> To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev
> Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
> Subject: [apps-discuss] Designating Apps Area related RFCs as Historic (was: Designating SUPDUP-related RFCs as Historic
> 
> I suggest that:
> 
>   (i)   You post an Internet-Draft with a list of (Apps Area) RFCs that you
>         would like to see reclassified
> 
>   (ii)  Ask the Apps Area ADs to present the I-D at a meeting so that
>         anyone interested is aware of the reclassification work
> 
>   (iii) Follow up on the Apps-discuss mailing list
> 
>   (iv)  Extended Last Call

+1; please prepare an omnibus action to do all the cleanup you want to do rather than doing them all as tiny batches or one-offs.  The time savings will be enormous.

And a belated +1 to Paul's sentiment (which you cited):

> 1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg02224.html

-MSK