[apps-discuss] IETF lists Re: draft-ietf-iri-comparison
t.petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> Wed, 28 January 2015 10:54 UTC
Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92BEC1A0E10 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 02:54:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id trxRHWQ8u9AJ for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 02:54:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am1on0755.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe00::755]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97E9E1A0AFE for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 02:54:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pc6 (81.151.167.59) by AMXPR07MB055.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.67.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.65.19; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:53:39 +0000
Message-ID: <00fa01d03ae8$7cbf9b60$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
References: <54B18B61.8010308@seantek.com> <54B19435.8070401@intertwingly.net> <54B1B211.3050807@seantek.com> <54B1B682.3070609@intertwingly.net> <012001d02d91$6ec42300$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <54B2781C.4040505@intertwingly.net> <018e01d02dc6$1d03b0a0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <54B2CC75.5080900@intertwingly.net> <54B79930.3070009@ninebynine.org> <54B7AEC2.9010109@intertwingly.net> <20150116033032.GD2350@localhost> <DM2PR0201MB096082B3915B85F60EDB617DC34F0@DM2PR0201MB0960.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <015c01d0362f$1f6f6020$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <BN3PR0201MB0945D77BAC3FFB5396057D7AC3360@BN3PR0201MB0945.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <54C65580.2080407@ninebynine.org> <E0FF89B4-6AD0-4F7C-AF41-C60DF30555E1@apple.com> <84E353AE-D96B-4211-99CB-D08AE17B1B1E@gbiv.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:52:13 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Originating-IP: [81.151.167.59]
X-ClientProxiedBy: DB3PR05CA0020.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.160.41.148) To AMXPR07MB055.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.67.149)
Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ietfc@btconnect.com;
X-DmarcAction-Test: None
X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:;
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(3005004);SRVR:AMXPR07MB055;
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:;
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004); SRVR:AMXPR07MB055;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 047001DADA
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377454003)(35754003)(13464003)(40100003)(44716002)(62236002)(81816999)(81686999)(116806002)(122386002)(33646002)(47776003)(19580405001)(62966003)(84392001)(61296003)(87976001)(1556002)(42186005)(50986999)(76176999)(230783001)(23746002)(50466002)(92566002)(93886004)(44736004)(50226001)(86362001)(229853001)(77156002)(15975445007)(1456003)(46102003)(66066001)(19580395003)(77096005)(14496001)(110136001)(74416001)(7726001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AMXPR07MB055; H:pc6; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:nov; PTR:InfoNoRecords; LANG:en;
Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: btconnect.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:AMXPR07MB055;
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jan 2015 10:53:39.7559 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AMXPR07MB055
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/56nM2reV2O91pusN1hhsaI66BbY>
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: [apps-discuss] IETF lists Re: draft-ietf-iri-comparison
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:54:07 -0000
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
To: "David Singer" <singer@apple.com>
Cc: "Graham Klyne" <GK@ninebynine.org>; <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 2:05 AM
....Roy
p.s. Am I the only one that finds it incredibly annoying that the
APPS area uses this umbrella list for technical discussions about
topics for which we still have the original working group mailing
list active, archived, and populated with folks still capable of
answering these questions? Ya know,
"http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/"
"http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-iri/"
Roy
Over the years, almost all the lists I deal with have come under the
umbrella of the IETF administration, giving them a consistent look and
feel, an adequate set of features, an easy way of reporting when the
archiving has collapsed (again), advance notice of many of the enforced
changes to my way of working, etc.
The result is less time spent on useless admin, more on real work.
So separate list, eg arcmedia, fine, under some third party which does
things differently or not at all .. thanks but no thanks.
Tom Petch
_______________________________________________
apps-discuss mailing list
apps-discuss@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
- [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notification … Matthew Kerwin
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Daniel Stenberg
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Daniel Stenberg
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… t.petch
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Sean Leonard
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… John C Klensin
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Sean Leonard
- [apps-discuss] "local convention" in draft-kerwin… Sean Leonard
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: [apps-discuss] "local convention" in draft-ke… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: [apps-discuss] "local convention" in draft-ke… t.petch
- Re: [apps-discuss] "local convention" in draft-ke… Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] "local convention" in draft-ke… Eric Burger
- Re: [apps-discuss] "local convention" in draft-ke… Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] "local convention" in draft-ke… Dave Cridland
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Larry Masinter
- Re: [apps-discuss] "local convention" in draft-ke… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Phillips, Addison
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Phillips, Addison
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Phillips, Addison
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… John Cowan
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Doug Royer
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-discuss] New Version Notification for d… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Julian Reschke
- [apps-discuss] URI parsing tests: userinfo handli… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] URI parsing tests: userinfo ha… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] URI parsing tests: userinfo ha… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] URI parsing tests: userinfo ha… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] URI parsing tests: userinfo ha… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] URI parsing tests: userinfo ha… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Sam Ruby
- [apps-discuss] Potential issues in RFC 3986 Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Potential issues in RFC 3986 Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Potential issues in RFC 3986 Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] Potential issues in RFC 3986 Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Graham Klyne
- [apps-discuss] presumption that RFC3986 is correc… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] presumption that RFC3986 is co… Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] presumption that RFC3986 is co… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] presumption that RFC3986 is co… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [apps-discuss] presumption that RFC3986 is co… Sean Leonard
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Sean Leonard
- Re: [apps-discuss] presumption that RFC3986 is co… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] presumption that RFC3986 is co… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [apps-discuss] Potential issues in RFC 3986 Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: [apps-discuss] presumption that RFC3986 is co… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] presumption that RFC3986 is co… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] presumption that RFC3986 is co… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-discuss] presumption that RFC3986 is co… Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… t.petch
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Larry Masinter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Sean Leonard
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… t.petch
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… t.petch
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Sean Leonard
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Sean Leonard
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Sean Leonard
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Sean Leonard
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… t.petch
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Sam Ruby
- [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragment … Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… t.petch
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] Parsing text into URLs that do… darrel.miller
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Sean Leonard
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Sean Leonard
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Nico Williams
- [apps-discuss] Filesystem I18N, again (Re: Fwd: F… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… darrel.miller
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… David Singer
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] presumption that RFC3986 is co… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Dave Cridland
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Dave Cridland
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: FW: New Version Notificat… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragm… Graham Klyne
- [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor - w… Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Dave Cridland
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Dave Cridland
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Henry S. Thompson
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Dave Cridland
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Dave Cridland
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Sean Leonard
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Sean Leonard
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… darrel.miller
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Dave Cridland
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Henry S. Thompson
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… t.petch
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Dave Cridland
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Larry Masinter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Sam Ruby
- [apps-discuss] What does it mean? (Re: Scope of R… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] What does it mean? (Re: Scope … Larry Masinter
- Re: [apps-discuss] What does it mean? (Re: Scope … Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] What does it mean? (Re: Scope … Sam Ruby
- [apps-discuss] Terminology and scope of [UI]Rx-li… Henry S. Thompson
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… t.petch
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… t.petch
- Re: [apps-discuss] What does it mean? (Re: Scope … Henry S. Thompson
- Re: [apps-discuss] What does it mean? (Re: Scope … Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Hector Santos
- Re: [apps-discuss] What does it mean? (Re: Scope … Dave Cridland
- Re: [apps-discuss] Terminology and scope of [UI]R… Sean Leonard
- Re: [apps-discuss] Terminology and scope of [UI]R… Henry S. Thompson
- Re: [apps-discuss] What does it mean? (Re: Scope … Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… darrel.miller
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Daniel Stenberg
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Sean Leonard
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… darrel.miller
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] Terminology and scope of [UI]R… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] What does it mean? (Re: Scope … Dave Cridland
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] Terminology and scope of [UI]R… Henry S. Thompson
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… mike amundsen
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… darrel.miller
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… mike amundsen
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Sam Ruby
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Larry Masinter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] What does it mean? (Re: Scope … Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] What does it mean? (Re: Scope … Martin J. Dürst
- [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-iri-comparison t.petch
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-iri-comparison Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-iri-comparison Larry Masinter
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-iri-comparison Larry Masinter
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-iri-comparison t.petch
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-iri-comparison Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-iri-comparison David Singer
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-iri-comparison Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-iri-comparison Larry Masinter
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-iri-comparison Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-iri-comparison James M Snell
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-iri-comparison Dave Cridland
- [apps-discuss] IETF lists Re: draft-ietf-iri-comp… t.petch
- Re: [apps-discuss] IETF lists Re: draft-ietf-iri-… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-iri-comparison Sean Leonard
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-iri-comparison Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Larry Masinter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Scope of RFC3986 and successor… Graham Klyne